Showing posts with label takes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label takes. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Toyota takes on Detroit with all-new Tundra truck

Toyota takes on Detroit with all-new Tundra truck

Paul A. Eisenstein , The Detroit Bureau – 2 days

You don’t get to be number one by sitting on the sidelines. Yet, since rolling out the original T100 more than two decades ago, Toyota has largely been left on the bench in the U.S. full-sizemarket. It remains the only major segment where the world’s largest automaker has repeatedly failed to become a significant, if not dominant player.

But Toyota is nothing if not patient. It took a series of tries to get on the boards in the once-thriving minivan market. And the Japanese maker is betting that it will eventually come up with the right formula for a full-size truck.

Like the one it is showing off in Chicago this week, an all-new version of the Toyota Tundra that has clearly been designed to correct past mistakes. The third-generation Toyota truck features a bolder, more rugged design, a bigger and quieter cabin, and a number of what the maker claims to be truck segment firsts, including Blind Spot Monitoring and Cross-Traffic Alert.

Whether that will be enough to take on the dominant domestics in one of the U.S. market’s largest and most profitable segments, however, is far from certain — especially with all of Toyota’s Detroit competitors digging in to maintain their current ranks. And the Japanese maker will soon face new competition from home as Nissan prepares a redesign of its own, slow-selling Titan.

“Toyota prides itself on listening to its customers and the development of the 2014 American-born Tundra is a perfect example,” contends Bill Fay, group vice president and general manager, Toyota Division.

Toyota has rapidly expanded its U.S. design and engineering operations in recent years, and the maker is billing the 2014 Tundra as “American-born.” No surprise, perhaps, considering this is a distinctly North American segment, with only marginal sales of full-size pickups beyond U.S. borders.

Development of the third-generation Toyota truck was largely handled through the Toyota Technical Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan while design work was the purview of the Calty Design Research centers in Newport Beach, California and Ann Arbor, Michigan. The truck will be assembled at Toyota’s San Antonio, Texas plant, appropriate considering the size of the Lone Star State’s pickup market.

But pickup sales across the U.S. are showing strong signs of revival after the devastating economic downturn. Trucks are closely linked to the housing market which is just beginning what could be a solid upturn over the next several years – making it all the more critical for Toyota to get things right with the 2014 Tundra.

The outgoing truck tried to distinguish itself with a design that wasn’t a me-too clone of the domestic competition. If anything, Toyota is moving more in line with the shape of Detroit sheet metal, something that may be more comforting to buyers in this most traditionalist of segments.

The chrome grille is 1.6-inches taller, the vehicle has a broader, more planted stance. With truck buyers, you can talk “bold,” but there’s a need to make your truck look rugged, durable and able to handle whatever you throw at it without complaint.

Perhaps the place the truck market has been changing most is in the interior. The new Chevrolet Silverado is a good example, opting for an evolutionary exterior design revision but a much more dramatic rejigging of the interior. Toyota appears to be following a similar philosophy.


The cabin of the 2014 Toyota Tundra is, it claims, bigger and more lavishly outfitted. A first glance suggests the maker has trimmed back on the cheap plastic parts and panels that have saved it money but cheapened the look of a number of models over the last decade. The maker claims it has put an emphasis on ergonomics – the driver’s reach for climate and audio controls has been trimmed by 2.6 inches, for example.

Meanwhile, each of the five individual grades gets its own distinct look and feel, something that Ford pioneered with the best-selling F-Series pickup. The Tundra SR5, the volume model in the line-up, will feature a “professional gear” theme, with metal accents and contrasting fabrics in a cabin divided into distinct driver and passenger modes.

The Platinum edition, meanwhile, accents “an urban, contemporary edge,” according to Toyota division General Manager Fay, “appealing to a new generation of buyers.”

If there’s a surprise in the details Toyota has revealed about the new 2014 Tundra it’s the maker’s decision to stick with its existing powertrain line-up, though it claims to have made some tweaks “to improve performance.”

There will still be the three familiar engine options, starting with a 4.0-liter DOHC V-6 making 270 horsepower and 278 lb-ft of torque. It’s paired with a 5-speed automatic.

The midrange engine is a 4.6-liter DOHC V-8 turning out 310 horsepower and 327 lb-ft, while the heavy lifter is the 5.7-liter V-8 churning out 381 hp and 401 lb-ft. Both V-8s are paired to 6-speed automatics. The 5.7 gives the Tundra a maximum 10,400 pounds of towing capacity in the 4?2 regular cab configuration.

With competitors offering a range of new, high-mileage alternatives, notably the popular Ford turbocharged EcoBoost V-6, and with word that General Motors and even Nissan could follow with standard-duty diesels, that raises the question about whether Toyota has more still in the development stage.

CEO Akio Toyota has often suggested he’d like a hybrid for just about every possible model. Could one eventually follow for Tundra? And in a conversation with TheDetroitBureau.com, Toyota division chief Fay suggested one might come out of the Japanese maker’s new joint venture with Ford. The two have teamed up to develop hybrid systems for larger vehicles that could include future truck models.

Innovation has become an increasingly important factor in the pickup market, whether it comes in the form of creative storage nooks or more high-tech features. There’ll be Bluetooth connectivity, of course, and on the safety front the new 2014 Toyota Tundra will be the first full-size pickup to get such features as the aforementioned Blind Spot Monitor and a standard-issue back-up camera. It will also feature eight airbags.

But there are still some things missing from the list. While the new Tundra will come in three cab styles, two-door Regular Cab, four-door Double Cab and four-door CrewMax, all of them offered with either 4?2 or 4?4, that still leaves the third-generation truck lacking the broader range of body styles of key Detroit competitors. And there’s nothing in the way of mid- and heavy-duty models.

Those are significant gaps, some observers caution. Could Toyota have bigger plans yet to come? That’s quite possible, certainly if it has ambitions to generate more than just incremental sales growth. Then again, the maker might have to wait until it does an even more complete tear-up of the Tundra platform later this decade.

It will certainly help that the overall full-size market is making a comeback after sliding to “just” 1.1 million units in 2009, its worst year in decades. Volume rebounded to 1.6 million last year, “and we see it hitting 1.6 million by 2015,” forecast Fay.

Toyota’s share, however, has been miniscule, U.S. sales reaching only 100,000 last year, or less than what Ford sold in under two months.

“We’ll probably not get a whole lot of (additional) volume this year,” cautioned Fay. “We’ll get a lift next year,” Toyota hoping 2014 will see Tundra sales climb to 130,000, still a marginal level.

The new Tundra, backed by Toyota’s marketing muscle, could make some further inroads longer-term but it remains to be seen whether the Japanese giant will finally move from the bench into the front line.

Copyright 2013 The Detroit Bureau

Friday, September 14, 2012

Worst drivers in America? Washington, D.C., takes the honor

Worst drivers in America? Washington, D.C., takes the honor

AP

Not only are the drivers bad, there's too much traffic. Motorists slog through the commute around Washington, D.C.

For those of us who live in and/or drive through major metropolitan areas, having to keep a watchful eye out for the antics of inattentive or even reckless drivers is a necessary part of our daily routine. You may think you’ve got it bad, but according to the eighth annual “America’s Best Drivers Report” issued by Allstate Insurance in Northbrook, Ill., Washington D.C. can again lay claim to having the absolute worst motorists in the nation.

Allstate studied the auto insurance claims frequency of America’s 200 largest cities and found that residents of our nation’s capital were found to get into collisions on average once every 4.7 years. This means they’re a whopping 112.1 percent more likely to be party to an accident than the typical driver in the U.S., who wrecks his or her car once every 10 years.

Taken on a statewide basis, California would seem to have the worst drivers overall, placing five cities among the top 25, including Glendale (5), San Francisco (10), Los Angeles (14), Fullerton (16) and Torrence (22). New Jersey came in a close second with four cities among the top 25, with Florida and Virginia tied for third with three cities each.

And, no, New York City didn’t even make the top 10 in Allstate’s 2012 list, though it still ranked at number 20, with residents being 41.1 percent more likely than the average motorist to get into an accident.

Meanwhile, the safest drivers can be found trolling the streets of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, where the average motorist experiences a collision only once every 13.8 years, which is 27.6 percent less likely than the national average. Other top-five safest cities include (in order): Boise, Idaho; Fort Collins, Colo.; Madison, Wis., and Lincoln, Neb.

Among larger metro areas, the safest cities include: Tuscon, Ariz., (13); Milwaukee, Wis., (15); and Kansas City, Mo., (16).

"It is vital for us to educate American drivers about safe driving behaviors they can practice on the road that will help make our roadways safer,” says Dave Prendergast, Allstate’s field senior vice-president. “Minimizing distractions, obeying traffic laws, and using your car’s safety features like turn signals and headlights, are all ways to be safer, no matter where you drive.”

Here is Allstate’s full list of the 25 cities having the worst drivers, with each citation noting the likelihood a motorist living there is to be involved in a crash, relative to the national average:

Washington, DC: 112.1% greater-than-average accident frequencyBaltimore, MD: 87.9%Providence, RI: 80.9%Hialeah, FL: 77.6%Glendale, CA: 77.5%Philadelphia, PA: 64.1%Alexandria, VA: 62.6%Newark, NJ: 59.4%Miami, FL: 58.4%San Francisco, CA: 54.6%Jersey City, NJ: 53.9%Arlington, VA: 53.0%Tampa, FL: 50.2%Los Angeles, CA: 48.5%Paterson, NJ: 46.9%Fullerton, CA: 42.7%Garland, TX: 41.6%Elizabeth, NJ: 41.5%Bridgeport, CT: 41.2%New York, NY: 41.1%New Haven, CT: 37.5%Torrance, CA: 36.7%Norfolk, VA: 36.3%Yonkers, NY: 36.2%Arlington TX: 35.4%

The fine print: the 2012 Allstate America’s Best Driver’s Report is based on an actuarial analysis of company claim data among the nation’s 200 largest cities. Property damage claims were analyzed over a two-year period (from January 2009 to December 2010) to ensure the findings would not be impacted by external influences such as weather or road construction. A weighted average of the two-year numbers determined the annual percentages. The report defines an auto crash as any collision resulting in a property damage claim.

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Ford takes aim at Lexus with new Lincoln MKZ

Ford takes aim at Lexus with new Lincoln MKZ

Geoff Robins / AFP - Getty Images

The Lincoln MKZ concept car is presented on January 10, 2012 on the 2012 North American International Auto Show in Detroit.

Ford takes aim at Lexus luxury sedan with a new Lincoln, which goes on sale this fall.

Ford said on Tuesday that the Lincoln MKZ from $35.925 to start. That's $175 less than the Lexus ES 350.

The MKZ is a critical product for Ford, that is trying to renew the Lincoln brand after years of neglect. It is the first in a series of new Lincoln's, the Ford plant in the next three years should be introduced.

Under the MKZ features is an all glass roof that opens automatically and slips through the rear window, give both front and rear passengers a convertible-like ride. It has Lincoln's split wing grille, one of the most famous features of the brand. But designer it weakened after complaints about the clumsy mouth on the recent Lincoln limousine.

The car is longer and wider, that there is a more luxurious look. It has an elegant, clean dashboard with flush buttons for controls instead of buttons.

Ford first revealed the new midsize MKZ car in January, but not the price up to now known.

The price tag is clearly Lincoln as a competitor to Lexus, which was the third top-selling luxury brand in the United States last year behind BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Lincoln was the top-selling brand in the United States in 1998, but it was obscured by Lexus for most of the next decade. Lincoln is now sold by seven other luxury brands.

Ford is also a hybrid version of the MKZ at the same price as the petrol version to offer. This is $2.750 of less than the hybrid Lexus ES 350. Ford offers since 2010 a hybrid MKZ at the same price as its petrol sibling, and says that it has brought new buyers to the brand.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Blind driver takes Google car for a spin

 

A video released by Google shows Steve Mahan, who is 95 percent blind, behind the wheel of its experimental self-driving car.

By Dan Carney, msnbc.com contributor

A blind guy driving a car? That was the latest step in Google's two-year-old program to develop a self-driving car.


A video released last week on YouTube shows Steve Mahan, who is almost totally blind, behind the wheel of a Toyota Prius, running errands to Taco Bell and the dry cleaners.


"Look Ma, no hands, and no feet!" Mahan says as the car steers autonomously along a carefully planned route. "This is some of the best driving I've ever done."


Google announced its self-driving car project in 2010, building on research started by a Stanford University that won a $2 million Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency challenge.


Although the Google demonstration followed a preplanned route, it shows the potential for such cars to work without extensive preparation, said spokesman Jay Nancarrow. But he said the company was not prepared to detail the vehicle's capabilities and limitations.


Autonomous cars outfitted with radar and laser sensors like the Prius would be liberating to people such as Mahan, who cannot drive on his own. “Where this would change my life would be to give me the independence and the flexibility to go to the places I both want to go and need to go, when I need to do those things,” Mahan said after his day in the car, which took place in January.


Even those without vision loss could benefit from the automation of driving because  computer-controlled cars would be able to drive in close formation to increase the traffic capacity of existing roads, said Google project leader Sebastian Thrun. This would save Americans 4 billion hours of wasted time and 2.4 billion gallons of gasoline, he estimated.


Thrun spoke at the TED conference last year about his personal motivation to develop a self-driving car. “As a boy I loved cars,” he said.  “When I turned 18 I lost my best friend to a car accident. Then I decided I would dedicate my life to saving 1 million people every year."




Tangi Quemener / AFP/Getty Images


Junior, a 2006 Volkswagen Passat, heavily modified and robotized by a team of Stanford University, crosses the finish line in first place of the DARPA Grand Challenge on Nov. 3, 2007, in Victorville, Calif.


His effort started with Stanley, a Volkwagen station wagon outfitted with sensors, which in 2005 was the first vehicle to complete DARPA’s challenge course.


“Since then our work has focused on building cars that can drive anywhere by themselves,” he said.


“Our cars have sensors with which they magically can see everything around them and make decisions about every aspect of driving. It is the perfect driving mechanism. We’ve driven in cities, like in San Francisco here. We’ve driven from San Francisco to Los Angeles on Highway 1.  And even crooked Lombard Street in San Francisco.”


Another video shows the Google autonomous Prius ripping through a snaking course of orange cones in a parking lot. This capability suggests the autonomous car need not proceed at the pace of a driver's ed student. 


Finally drivers would be able to focus on things they’ve already shown are more important to them than watching the road, like talking on the phone, texting friends, checking Facebook, eating and personal grooming. Maybe they could watch the YouTube video of the blind guy in the driver's seat.

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Chrysler takes aim at two-tier wage system

 


Carlos Osorio / AP



The number of direct hours of labor in a typical Detroit product has been dropping steadily, to under 20 in some cases.


It took Detroit’s automakers decades to win a money-saving two-tier wage structure from the United Auto Workers Union. But that might be about to change at Chrysler.


The automaker’s CEO Sergio Marchionne now says he’d rather have all his workers on the same pay scale, hinting at big changes when the maker’s new contract expires in 2015.


That has plenty of folks in the auto industry scratching their heads and wondering what the executive — who also heads Chrysler’s Italian partner Fiat — has in mind.


What’s clear is that the UAW also wants to eliminate the two-tier structure, something that has divided the union and nearly led to the rejection of this year’s contracts with Chrysler, General Motors and Ford.


“This economic disparity between people on the (production) line is not something that can go on indefinitely,” Marchionne told reporters during a conference call to discuss the carmaker’s quarterly earnings.


Ironically, industry analysts say that reduced labor costs played a major factor in the $212 million profit Chrysler made as it clawed its way back into the black in the latest quarter.


Newly hired workers — about 13 percent of Chrysler's hourly work force — earn just $14 to $16 an hour in wages and about $25 when all their benefits and other costs are added in.  That’s roughly half what it costs to employ a veteran member of Chrysler’s 26,000-strong UAW work force.


But those costs will be going up. Going into this year’s contract talks with Detroit’s Big Three, the UAW was well aware that it was not going to win much in the way of new money, so it had to focus on a short list of gains that included so-called signing bonuses and cash to offset inflation during the course of the four-year contract.


But it was clear there was strong rank-and-file opposition to the two-tier wage system — which was approved by the UAW during 2007 contract talks to help the industry weather what was clearly going to be a tough recession.


Going into this year’s contract talks, UAW President Bob King asserted that workers in the second tier were not “making a living wage,” but in the end he had to settle for modest pay increases of about $3 an hour for those new hires.


The response was unavoidable, with workers approving their tentative contracts by some of the largest margins seen in decades. In fact, if not for aggressive lobbying by King and other senior leaders the Ford contract very likely would have been rejected. And UAW leaders had to use a procedural trick to ensure ratification of Chrysler’s contract.


That clearly wasn’t lost on Marchionne, who is counting on big growth at Chrysler — the smallest and most troubled of the Detroit automakers.


Facing even more serious problems with unions back in Italy, Marchionne has hinted he might make Chrysler the dominant partner in the trans-Atlantic alliance. To do that, it would help to have the UAW “on his side,” notes analyst Joe Phillippi of AutoTrends Consulting. And that might require giving up the two-tier wage structure, he added.


But it might not be as serious a loss as that might seem. There’s no question that Detroit needed a break, especially going into the 2007 contract talks, when UAW workers were taking home wages and benefits worth some $76 an hour.


Today labor costs for even veteran employees have been reduced by a third, even as non-union competitors, such as the Honda plant in Marysville, Ohio, have seen their own costs rise.


But there’s something that may be more significant than the wages and benefits workers earn: concessions the UAW has granted permitting Chrysler and its domestic competitors to steadily improve productivity.


Plants that once employed 5,000 workers now require less than half that staffing. The number of direct hours of labor in a typical Detroit product has been dropping steadily, meanwhile, to under 20 in some cases. 


Even at $50 an hour, notes Phillippi, assembly line labor accounts for barely $1,000 to $2,000 of the $30,000 cost of a typical U.S.-built car.


Keeping the UAW happy may be well worth giving up the second tier, which Marchionne said would approach 25 percent of the total Chrysler workforce by 2015, when the current contract expires.


Those who know the executive believe this change wouldn’t be a simple giveback. The Canadian-educated Marchionne would almost certainly demand a quid-pro-quo, possibly meaning further concessions by veteran workers. At the very least, eliminating the second tier would be offset by holding back cost increases elsewhere.


In his conversation with reporters, Marchionne suggested his goal would be to convince the UAW “to accept the downside while rewarding people on the upside.”


The new Detroit contracts include significant improvements in profit sharing bonuses. The next time around, Chrysler may very well seek to get even more of its labor costs linked to its performance, so workers would see major gains during good years while taking pay cuts in the bad times.


Whether the UAW and its members would accept that trade-off remains to be seen.