Showing posts with label crash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crash. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Subaru only small SUV ranked 'good' on crash test

Subaru only small SUV ranked 'good' on crash test
Paul A. Eisenstein The Detroit Bureau May 16, 2013 at 12:26 PM ET

It may look bad, but the 2014 Subaru Forester was the only CUV to earn a "good" crash test rating by IIHS.
Five popular crossover-utility vehicles failed the new overlap crash test designed to simulate an impact with a pole or other narrow object -- one of the most common sources of highway fatalities.

Only the 2014 Subaru Forester passed the test, earning a “good” rating from the trade group the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport landed an “acceptable” rating.

Among the vehicles to fail the test, earning a “poor rating,” were the recently updated Ford Escape, the Jeep Patriot, the Buick Encore, the Kia Sportage and the Hyundai Tucson. The Jeep Wrangler, Nissan Rogue, Mazda CX-5, Volkswagen Tiguan and Honda CR-V were among those compact crossovers to earn a “marginal” rating.

IIHS conducts crash tests on most models available on the U.S. market. Most of the tests are also conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration – but the trade group recently added the small overlap crash test in an effort to replicate some of the more common real-world crashes.

The test is similar to what happens when a thin corner of a vehicle slams into a tree or utility pole. In the test, 25 percent of a vehicle's front end on the driver’s side strikes a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier at 40 mph.

“Most vehicles today are designed to do well in the government's full-width front crash test and in the Institute's moderate overlap front test, but that is no guarantee of good performance in a small overlap crash,” noted a report from the trade group. “In a 2009 IIHS study of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants.”

Manufacturers have complained about the difficulty of passing the new test and have started to design products to address the challenges it creates.

That appears to have been a key goal for Subaru, said Joe Nolan, the IIHS vice president overseeing vehicle research: “And they succeeded.”

"This is exactly how we hoped manufacturers would respond to improve protection for people in these kinds of serious frontal crashes,” Nolan said.

The 2014 Forester and the 2013 Outlander are the only two CUVs among the 13 to earn a “Top Safety Pick+” rating from the IIHS.

The Institute had less kind words for the Jeep Patriot, dubbing it “the worst for restraints and kinematics.” The test dummy bounced around within the small crossover and the side curtain airbag didn’t even deploy during the test.

Meanwhile, the IIHS noted that “the front pillar of the Nissan Rogue's door frame was pushed far inside the occupant compartment and after the crash was almost touching the driver seat.”

Copyright © 2009-2013, The Detroit Bureau

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Driving with pets crash prices increases, says study

Driving with pets crash prices increases, says study
Michael strong, the Detroit Bureau - 3 days

As head of the U.S. Department of transportation declared repeatedly his goal distracted driving Ray LaHood, such as while driving talk. A new study adds another to his list of driving No. nos: pets, particularly for senior drivers.

To say, researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham that both overall and at fault crash rates for drivers 70 years or older higher which were their pet often rode with them.

"This is the first study to assess the presence of pets in a vehicle as a possible internal distraction for older drivers," said Gerald McGwin, co-author of the study and a professor in the Department of epidemiology.

The crash risk for drivers, who drove with their pets was the double of drivers who never drove with an animal. Crash rates for those who occasionally or rarely drove with pets were tariffs for non-pet owner.

LaHood has good reason, distracted driving be worried: it makes more than 10 percent of all U.S. highway deaths, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The Government recently policies around the eyes of the driver, mobile phones, and on the road and discouraging car manufacturers prevent troublesome dashboard devices make.

The guidelines are to limit how long drivers look from the street. After Highway Safety Administration, drivers should their eyes off the road for longer than two seconds do not ingest. A playful pet, especially one on the front seats could require too much attention.

More than half of pet owners said, took their pet with them in the car at least temporarily usually riding in the front seat or the back seat.

"The increased crash rate for older drivers who drive always with pets is important in connection with the awareness of drivers of potentially dangerous driving habits."

The problem with pets in the car not have, that they are likely to physically interfere in the operation of the vehicle, but that they are disturbing. Hawaii is the only State that currently the driver before a pet in driver lap prohibits. Arizona, Connecticut and Maine have broader laws restrict conduct or activities which could potentially distract a driver such laws can apply to pets in a vehicle.

The authors suggest that older drivers slower cognitive performance and response time than younger riders displayed when dealing with "a higher cognitive or physical workload while driving."

"Another disturbing element, especially an active, potentially moving animal, provides more options for an older driver to cope with a condition in a satisfactory way less than add", McGwin said.

In the study, researchers noted, that 83 percent of respondents agreed it was unsafe, pets, to allow travel unrestrained in a vehicle but only 16 percent is trying to use any kind of pet safety restraint in your vehicle.

The study employs 2,000 community living - people who do not live in assisted living or nursing homes - licensed drivers aged 70 and over. There were 691 participants had pets.

Copyright © 2009-2013, the Detroit Bureau

Monday, December 24, 2012

Family saloons to luxury cars in crash tests

Family saloons to luxury cars in crash tests

Paul A. Eisenstein, the Detroit Bureau
Only two of the 18 medium-sized family cars earned "good" ratings in the new frontal crash test Insurance Institute of highway safety, and one of those is soon the market left.

The 2013 Honda Accord and Suzuki Kizashi were just good grades earn a further 11 as "acceptable" established medium-sized sedans with the IIHS rating models.

In the category "Poor", the industry-funded organization reported insurance, recently revised, Camry and the new Prius V landed two cars from Toyota. The hybrid model of "sustained major structural damage in the test," revealed the IIHS in a new version.

Toyota responds to IIHS results with a statement saying, "regular, heavy or special tests that exceed federal requirements developed Insurance Institute for highway safety (IIHS). With this new test, the Institute has again raised the bar, and we respond to the challenge. "We values the new test protocols and can say that there is no uniform solution more crash performance in this area to reach."

Totals may not impressive, even better the family limousine actually as a mid-sized luxury and in the vicinity of luxury models previously tested by the Institute of IIHS President Adrian Lund noted.

"It is worth noting, Lund said, adding that" the difference is stunning. "Thirteen of these midsize cars offer better protection of the crash than all but three of their colleagues luxury and at a price that the purse is easier."

This was the first time the IIHS established limousine, laid by his strict new small overlap test had, what happens to simulate when a car another vehicle or object on the roadside as a telephone pole or tree meets. Security experts say that the test reflected a significant number of real-world crashes and probably more representative than some older barrier tests, what happened.

"The impacts in these tests is as damage can see we in the real world where crashes are head and chest hurt," noted the head of the IIHS.

Industry engineers say that the new test is still a particularly difficult challenge - sets, especially as the most modern vehicles is not intentionally designed to achieve the new objective - where only 25 percent of the front of the car on the driver's side in a 5-foot-high barrier at 40 miles per hour is dangers.

"The Camry and Prius V what can go wrong in a crash of the small overlap, in spite of good reviews in (other) IIHS tests show" cautioned the trade group.

Researchers found that there virtually no crash structure, to the energy of the impact, so remove the wheel most of the hit, what "high levels of occupant compartment penetrate."

Lund stressed that "Toyota's engineers have a lot of work to do to match the performance of its competitors."

In contrast, the accord and the Kizashi were the Stand-Outs in the test. The Honda sedan went on sale recently but the Suzuki model is becoming increasingly difficult to find as the Japanese manufacturer has decided to get out of the American market in the months ahead.

Now qualify the two Japanese models for the IIHS "top safety pick +" award. The accord will qualify in his Coupe and sedan configurations.

The Detroit Bureau: Ford promises 'isolated' quality problems fix

Total currently only 13 models is qualify. To achieve this level, a vehicle must first achieve a good rating in four of the five other tests (and an acceptable in the other test), including moderate overlap frontal crash and side-impact and rollover. The vehicle must then be acceptable or good in the new small overlap test result.

The winners are so far: the Dodge Avenger and its sister model, the Chrysler 200 4-door; Ford Fusion; Honda Accord 2 doors; Honda Accord 4-door; KIA Magentis; Nissan Altima 4 door; Subaru legacy and its sister model, the Subaru Outback; Suzuki Kizashi and VW Passat.

Only two luxury models qualify so far tested: the Acura TL and the Volvo S60.

A further 117 vehicles earn the less demanding "top safety pick" honor, in some cases, because they have not yet undergone on the tough new crash-test.

Together with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which sets commissioned safety standards and running your own tests the IIHS had significant implications for vehicle design in recent years. And industry engineers say they have now to keep the new test in the eye.

"We have seen that car manufacturers make structural and restraint in response to our small overlap test changes", says Lund. "Five manufacturers to improve new mid-sized cars to small overlap crash protection."

Friday, August 31, 2012

Luxury cars fare poorly in new crash tests

Only three of 11 mid-sized luxury cars and near-luxury cars earned good or acceptable ratings in the latest crash test from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. NBC's Tom Costello reports.

By Paul A. Eisenstein, The Detroit Bureau
Hoping to push the industry to further improve the safety of tomorrow’s cars, an influential insurance trade group has launched a new test designed to simulate a very common real world crash situation.

And of the 11 new compact luxury sedans put through the test by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, only two earned a “good” rating while one other was rated “acceptable.”

Explaining the need for the new, partial front end test, institute President Adrian Lund said, “Nearly every new car performs well in other frontal crash tests conducted by the institute and the federal government, but we still see more than 10,000 deaths in frontal crashes each year.”

The new IIHS test differs markedly from those currently used – and from the standards manufacturers are required to meet under federal law. Nonetheless, it is designed to simulate the sort of frontal collisions that are responsible for a large share of those deaths, according to Lund.

As part of the test a vehicle is driven into a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier at 40 mph, but only 25 percent of the driver’s side of the vehicle actually makes contact with the barrier. The test simulates what often happens when two vehicles clip one another on a local road where one driver might inadvertently cross the center line, or where a vehicle hits a tree or utility pole.

Only the Acura TL and Volvo S60 passed the test with a “good” rating. The Infiniti G was rated “acceptable.”

Those vehicles that failed the test included the Acura TSX, BMW 3-Series, Lincoln MKZ and Volkswagen CC, all rated “marginal,” while the Audi A4, Lexus ES 350, Lexus IS 250/350 and Mercedes-Benz C-Class were all rated “poor.”

The Volvo used several methods to reinforce the passenger compartment safety cage, including upper rails, noted Lund. At the other extreme, the VW CC performed so poorly that the driver’s door was completely sheared off its hinges, the first time that has occurred in IIHS testing.

Safety experts credit tests run by both federal regulators and the IIHS with prompting automakers to improve the ability of their vehicles to survive crashes – something that has played out in a sharp decline in highway fatalities in recent years. In vehicles no more than three years old, the number of fatalities from frontal crashes, in particular, has declined by 55 percent since 2001.

A statement from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration praised the new tests, suggesting the agency “looks forward to seeing how vehicle manufacturers respond to this new rating criteria and the safety benefits it will yield.”

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

GM recalling 38,000 police cars due to crash risk

General Motors is recalling more than 38,000 Chevrolet Impala police cars in the U.S. and Canada because a part in the front suspension can crack and cause a crash.

The recall affects police cars from the 2008 through 2012 model years. The lower control arm in the suspension can fracture, causing sudden changes in handling that could make the driver lose control, GM said in documents posted Saturday on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website.

Impalas sold to the public have some different suspension parts and are not affected by the recall, spokesman Alan Adler said. "We tested for durability on the civilian Impala, and we believe there are no issues," he said.

GM doesn't know of any crashes or injuries from the problem. If a fracture occurs, a squeal or chirp is likely to come from the tire area at low speeds, GM said in the documents.

The company will replace the lower control arms at no charge to police departments. Parts are available, and departments can call dealers to schedule repairs, Adler said.

The problem was discovered after GM got reports from several police fleets that the lower control arms had cracked near a bushing sleeve. GM began investigating the problem in February, and in July, GM engineers had traced the problem to lower control arms that the company started using in the middle of the 2008 model year, the documents said.

All the cars were built at GM's factory in Oshawa, Ontario.

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Crash course teaches teens such as accidents to avoid


Teen driver Shannon Carney, the daughter of the writer Dan Carney, learns to control accident prevention/highway safety course as their way out of trouble at the BSR.

By Dan Carney, NBCNews-Le
Summer is usually the time, when training courses of driver's log top driver their behind-the-wheel hours so they can earn their licenses. Soon they will be trekking to the DMV, or perhaps get the courthouse, allows their freshly baked driving.

But drive, is a skill that improves so while these that they are finished think new driver, with testing a car under the watchful eyes of instructors they just to school complete to continue both with experience and training, such as most of the activities.

The is the thinking of the instructor at the BSR performed at the Summit point accident prevention/highway safety course Motorsports Park about an hour from Washington, D.C. And this is, why I my own teenage daughter in the class to try the instruction with on the line mixes action sent.

Other schools in the country result in similar classes, and indeed our own Fairfax County (Virginia) Police Department offers young people a class with a similar curriculum. A variety of motivations offered other parents to sign their children for the class, but mostly everyone wants to keep their young drivers safe.

Student Jenny Burstein said that accidentally ran over a street sign, when she lost control in a cross in the rain. "It's a good experience," said Plassnik. "Now I know how you countersteer." It helps in any case. "At least I hope so."

A mother said that she believes that it does. She wrote to her daughter in the course class was older brother of the girl and by what he learned to avoid collision with a couple of skateboarders, started the by an intersection - against the light - right in front of him on the day after the class. He would the skateboarder told without the class preparation for emergency braking, killed boy have his mother.

Many of the fathers were car enthusiasts and former sports car drivers who were already familiar with the route and had planned to bring, to learn, to which they were born since the day their children there. "I have planned for them, to do this, since she was very young," said Wayne Burstein. "It is all about your kids care", he continued. Of course the driver fathers thought she could teach their children how to control the car itself, but as Burstein, recognized that children hear others better than their parents in such situations.

"This is get on the learning of muscle memory in driver's ED can not", he said.

The class covers topics such as basic vehicle control brakes on the border of traction to avoid braking when turning, restoring control over a car, the street dodging around obstacles on the road (as skateboarders!), has left skid control and to the loss of the power to deal with and makes brake assist.

How many drivers on the road today have training and experience in an auto slide on a wet road with, so they can learn how control in a secure environment to recover? Or how one of the most deadly forms of crashes to survive: the off-road over-correction? That is, if a car drops the wheels right over the edge of the road and the driver panic and the car pulls to the left, so that to shoot it across the street into oncoming traffic.

The young people at the BSR accident avoidance class practiced security in this situation responding, it occurs on the road they are ready. The trick? Nothing to do.

The gas to make it easier to hold the steering wheel ensure that drive the car under control and then gradually return to the road. It is so easy.

Critics complain about the teen driver training, it only will encourage you to take more risks, but it is hard to see, what risks "do nothing" off-road recreation training could provide.

Then there are the formidable "Save the mirror" - test. Of course the young pilots need to secure on the shoulders look, but the BSR trainers made practice, secure children with only mirror for those occasions, if they can not see out of the back for one reason or another. It went bad in this test the Orange Cone, but it gave the children good practice and increased the need for it, constantly to improve so they can parking car without crunching their parents.

But not parking is usually a matter of life and death, while other aspects of driving can be. So prepare for that moment between the knowledge that a mistake was made and the striking a fixed object, the accident avoidance class trying reported teacher Don Ruschman. "A few seconds an untrained driver is in most cases rely on their instincts," he said. "The problem is that when driving under stress, our instincts are almost always wrong."

The best preparation for emergencies, providing students the class them escape route from a looming collision search training is, he said. "Drivers instincts are interesting on their way view that represents a danger to them, when what they need to do, is to look for the way to this object", Ruschman said. "In search of the flight path instead of what it is, what happens is, you make it need, it is incredibly difficult to do under pressure/pressure of the moment."

On the line skid pad time teenagers learn how to find their way out of trouble, where they want to take the car and practice ways to find it. "Here learn them how to detect, control and recover from skids, but more important is the skid pad is most 'Bulb' on such as where we are looking more than 90 percent of the controls where the car goes on."

My own daughter noted that their trainers keep constant reminder her "eyes", looking to the future for the effort and means, was the best lesson took them out of school. This fact underlines the need, people have different statement, teens as parents, do, because her mother and I often not far enough forward look their usual, had pointed out to anticipate events. Everything, which took it to the sink in the message that it pays is participating in the class just for this course, to hear that essentially the same from someone else.

Children can resist the idea of additional school, but parents will rest easier, after seeing their children polishing their coping strategies for a class such as the BSR accident prevention school.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Crash avoidance technologies save lives

Crash avoidance technologies save lives

GM

GMC introduced the industry's first crash avoidance system in the 2012 Terrain.

By Paul A. Eisenstein, The Detroit Bureau
While it’s likely to be a number of years before fully autonomous vehicles start rolling onto the nation’s highways the latest crash avoidance technologies – including autonomous braking systems – are having a major impact, according to a new study that finds they result in significantly fewer crashes, injuries and fatalities.

The new report by the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) reveals that forward collision avoidance systems – especially those that can begin to brake even before the driver is aware of a problem – and adaptive lighting systems are delivering the biggest benefits.

But not all the new crash-avoidance technologies are proving equally effective. There’s no clear evidence that blind spot detection and park assist systems have a measurable effect. And Lane Departure Warning technology “appears to hurt, rather than help,” the new report cautions.

"As more automakers offer advanced technologies on their vehicles, insurance data provide an early glimpse of how these features perform in the real world,” says Matt Moore, vice president of HLDI, an affiliate of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). “So far, forward collision technology is reducing claims, particularly for damage to other vehicles, and adaptive headlights are having an even bigger impact than we had anticipated.”

Analysts for the insurance industry research organization looked at how each new collision avoidance feature affected claim frequency for vehicles produced between model-years 2000 and 2011, depending upon when the technologies were first introduced.

Experts caution, however, that such research can be misleading, especially early on. It can take time for makers to work out the bugs in new technologies – and for motorists to become both familiar with and comfortable using new technologies. In the early years of active safety technology – systems designed to intervene to prevent a collision rather than simply reduce the impact of an accident, such as airbags – there were problems with a number of devices now considered essential.

Early data appeared to show that anti-lock brake systems were resulting in an increased number of collisions. Yet today, ABS is not only mandated by federal law but serves as the base technology for more advanced systems such as autonomous braking.

But there is enough evidence that HLDI found a 14% lower rate of claims for Acura and Mercedes-Benz vehicles equipped with forward collision warning with autonomous braking when compared to otherwise identical vehicles not equipped with such systems.

“Mercedes and Volvo also offer versions of forward collision warning that don’t include autonomous braking,” a summary of the study notes. “These appeared to lower crash rates, too, but not to the same extent as versions that do include it.”

Meanwhile, HLDI found a clear pay-off when it examined the effectiveness of adaptive headlights on Acura, Mazda, Mercedes and Volvo vehicles – a drop in claims of as much as 10%. Adaptive headlights use factors such as the speed of a vehicle and the angle of the steering wheel to help aim headlamps so a driver can see around a corner.

“Injury claims of all types, both for injuries to occupants of the insured vehicles and to other road users, fell substantially for all but one make,” says the report.

Perhaps the biggest surprise of the study was the increased insurance claim rate associated with Lane Departure Warning technology. HLDI stressed that the increase was “statistically insignificant,” but suggests that this feature does not appear to be having the desired effect.

Those results will likely be re-examined and debated. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, another trade group associated with HLDI, previously forecast that lane departure systems could eliminate or at least mitigate up to 7,259 fatal crashes annually.

“Lane departure warning may end up saving lives down the road, but so far these particular versions aren’t preventing insurance claims,” Moore says. “It may be that drivers are getting too many false alarms, which could make them tune out the warnings or turn them off completely. Of course, that doesn’t explain why the systems seem to increase claim rates, but we need to gather more data to see if that’s truly happening.”

As with early ABS systems, researchers suggest that the industry will have to examine the way Lane Departure Warning systems operate. The first anti-lock brake devices often tried to warn the driver of an impending skid by violently pulsing the steering wheel, but evidence indicated motorists often responded by lifting off the brake when that happened.

With Lane Departure warning it may take some significant changes in the way the technology alerts a motorist – or perhaps the use of more automated systems. Cadillac has forgone the typical lights and buzzers with its new XTS and ATS models. It alerts motorists to problems – such as drifting out of one’s lane – by shaking the vehicle’s seat in the direction of the problem. Some Lexus products, meanwhile, actually help nudge a vehicle back into its lane.

“Just as forward collision warning systems that include autonomous braking cut crashes more sharply than those that don’t, lane departure prevention systems that don’t rely on a driver’s response may hold more promise than the systems HLDI has looked at so far,” says David Zuby, chief research officer at IIHS.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Low tire pressure triples likelihood of crash

Mark Duncan / AP

A new government study warns that as many as one in 20 crashes could be linked to tire-related problems, with underinflated tires posing an especially high risk of causing a problem.

By Paul A. Eisenstein, The Detroit Bureau
Today’s tires are engineering marvels, improving both performance and fuel economy, even if they tend to largely be ignored by motorists. But that’s a problem that also could turn a tire into a killer.

A new government study warns that as many as one in 20 crashes could be linked to tire-related problems, with underinflated tires posing an especially high risk of causing a problem.

“Tire problems are inherently hazardous to vehicle safety,” said the report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which based its study on crash data covering a three-year period from 2005 to 2007.

The report found that underinflation was the biggest problem, with a tire 25 percent below its rated pressure three times more likely to be involved in a crash.

Part of the problem is that a low tire reduces the vehicle’s stability even under ideal conditions, but it also makes it significantly more difficult for a driver to maintain control in bad weather or during emergency maneuvers, such as swerving to avoid an obstacle in the road.

Problems also can result from worn tires, especially those that have gone bald or have damage to the tire that could lead to a catastrophic blow-out.

The study noted that tire problems, in general, were more likely to lead to accidents in bad weather.

Industry officials say the study underscores the need to properly maintain tires, repairing or replacing those that are damaged while always keeping tires at the proper inflation.

That message should now weigh doubly on the minds of consumers. Properly inflated tires also deliver significantly better fuel economy. A low tire can reduce mileage by as much as 5 to 10 percent, by various estimates.

Carroll Shelby Dead at 89

Regulators and industry officials alike have been paying more attention to tire safety since the recall of 13 million tires used on the Ford Explorer a decade ago. Problems with the tires – compounded by improper inflation – were linked to 280 deaths.

Congress subsequently passed a law mandating all vehicles be equipped with tire-pressure monitoring systems, or TPMS. But the more basic version of the technology is prone to false alerts and doesn’t necessarily show which tire is low, with some studies suggesting consumers often ignore the warnings.

That has led many manufacturers to adopt more advanced TPMS technology – such as will become available in the 2013 Nissan Altima – that provides specific inflation information on each individual tire.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

SUVs now safer in crash; small cars risky

SUV are driver now among the least likely in a car accident die according to new findings released Thursday by the Insurance Institute for highway safety (IIHS). Major retailers like Wal-Mart are thinking the country's most prominent retail giant, target and Wal-Mart small, smaller versions of their familiar mega stores test. Life Inc.: Beloved you your family enough, to work more? Many see in difficult times, night shift in a new Licht life Inc.: fathers have also occupation issues

The change is largely to the widespread availability of electronic stability control (ESC), which to prevent rollover. With the tendency to reduced roll over SUVs are safer than cars, to balance because their larger size and weight offer better protection in a crash, the IIHS said.

"The risk of rollover in SUVs used their size/weight advantage prevail, but that is no longer the case, thanks to ESC," said Anne McCartt, Senior Vice President of the Institute for research.

When driver death rates by vehicle style are considered, minivans deaths per million registered vehicles have the best results with a mortality rate of 25 riders, the insurance industry funded security group found. SUVs are not far behind with 28, and pickup trucks on average 52 driver deaths. Cars have a mortality rate of 56, but smaller cars with fare worse than larger, 4-door motor coaches show a mortality rate of 82, compared to 46 for very large 4-door vehicles.

The IIHS analysis driver death rates measured from 2006 to 2009, for the years 2005-8 model. A general death rate registered 48 deaths per million vehicles found during this period.

It is not only weight, which gives the advantage of SUVs. It is also the height of the vehicle and other factors. When compared to cars and SUV's of similar weight, the SUVs have lower death rates, which said IIHS.

© 2011 msnbc.com

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Sheet, Volt earn top safety ratings in crash tests

DETROIT - the Chevrolet Volt and Nissan leaf got top safety ratings in some of the first electric an insurer-funded research group tests.

Both cars earned top scores for front, side and rear impact crashes and rollover crash protection, according to the results Tuesday from the Insurance Institute for highway safety released.

While the leaf and Volt as small cars are classified, said the Institute, their heavy batteries their weight put closer to large sedans. The Volt, weighs for example, 3760, which is close to the weight of the Chevrolet Impala. The sheet weighs a Nissan Altima ultimately, similar to mid-sized car. This additional mass protects its occupants as heavier vehicles in a crash are pushed, are less likely.

The tide is running only on battery power and has a range of about 100 miles. The Volt can go around 40 miles on an electric charge, before a small gas engine.

Story: Nissan new US orders for electric leaf takes

The Institute said it was the first time it has tested shape plug-in cars. Two golf cart-like electric vehicles, the gem e2 and Wheego whip, were tested for research purposes, but bad in carried out side-impact tests, said the group. But these vehicles at very low speeds run and are not required to meet federal safety standards.

The Federal Government has released not yet crash-test results for the Volt and the leaf.

"What powers of the wheels is different, but the level of safety for the Volt and the leaf is our other top crash test cast, as high as all", said Joe Nolan, chief administrative officer of the Institute.

The Institute, which is financed by insurance companies, will buy the cars that it tests directly from the dealer.

Copyright 2011, the associated press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.