Toyota in the U.S. settlement over unintended acceleration

The U.S. Justice Department has a $1 billion-settlement with Toyota reached the engine about the automaker's handling of consumer complaints tied to unintended vehicle acceleration and is supposed to give the agreement already, as Wednesday, CNN reported.

Sources familiar told CNN the deal, that Toyota was expected to avoid prosecution.

The US Attorney in Manhattan has allegations of Japanese company misled-United States authorities probe after complaints of unintended acceleration emerged. The acceleration question prompted Toyota recall millions of vehicles, from the year 2009.

"Toyota has worked with the US Attorney in this matter for more than four years," said a spokeswoman from Toyota CNN. "During this time we have a more responsive and customer-oriented organisation fundamental changes are made, and we are committed to further improvements."

Office could not immediately reach officials in the U.S. Attorney General's opinion.

The car manufacturer dedicated to last year more than to resolve $1 billion damages claims in connection with the recall.

Read More

Toyota in negotiations, to pay for sudden acceleration lawsuits

Toyota Motor Corp. opened talks to hundreds of State and federal lawsuits claim that defects caused its vehicles to accelerate suddenly and settle what serious crash, injuries and deaths.

Decision, giving the courts called an "intense settlement process" could bring closure, plaintiff, the world's largest automaker were fighting since 2009 have and which already spent Toyota, more than 2 billion $ in court costs and his public reputation suffered damage.

The automakers have a further incentive to end his long legal test: lost first process in case sudden acceleration as an Oklahoma jury found that defective electronics on a Camry caused an accident, killed one woman and seriously injured another. The jury assessed a $3 million judgment against Toyota.

"The turning point must have been this loss in Oklahoma," said Byron Stier, Professor at Southwestern Law School. "It was such a shock. The people thought sudden acceleration was a dead issue, but the judgment changed everything."

The Japanese automaker has repeatedly denied that its vehicles instead the incidents of driver error fault were flawed. It sudden acceleration, had three straight trials, involving him gained confidence in his attitude.

But it has more than 300 lawsuits in federal and national courts nationwide, of which Ana and the State cases in Los Angeles County Superior Court in Southern California, have been consolidated with the federal cases in a U.S. District Court in Santa.

The two judges who ordered treating cases that Toyota had agreed to start the intensive consolidation late Thursday. They remained in their courtrooms all pending cases until the conclusion of the negotiations.

Toyota launches conferences on a case by case basis under the judicial settlement command in February. If a deal cannot be reached, go, and when even the suits before a mediator could be returned after testing always unresolved.

"This process bring more efficiency to the resolution of pending cases and results in a clear way forward for those claims that can not be resolved outside the study," said Toyota spokeswoman Carly Schaffner. The automaker declined further comment.

It is unclear how long it might take to complete the settlement in the consolidated cases, but lawyers of the plaintiffs said it was sure that most, if not in all cases without trial would be solved.

"This is a positive step," said Moses Lebovits, co-lead counsel in the consolidated cases of California. "We have worked very hard, and we are pleased that we to a meaningful conclusion to get."

Toyota will also try to solve a handful of pending state that were not consolidated. Some are scheduled for trial early next year.

The decision, the negotiations could also help, which car manufacturer more surprises, to avoid 24 judgment in Oklahoma, such as for example the Oct. that find that it acted with regard to "ruthlessly" for the safety of his customers.

The Oklahoma case was that that the electronic throttle control system in Toyota vehicles was defective, a strategy, the other plaintiffs said first, who claim that they planned to pursue the pending tests.

"I really think that the evidence in this case was very, very strong", said Cole Portis, one of the lawyers of the plaintiff in the case. "To defend the computer system on the cars was going to be very difficult to do. There were still more great judgments."

One of the following cases is for test Feb. 19 in a Michigan State Court scheduled. It's the same model as in the case of Oklahoma. The driver, Guadalupe Alberto, crashed her Camry 2005 into a tree and died after the car suddenly accelerated.

Eric Snyder, lawyer for Alberto family, cheered the news of potential settlements in the Federal Republic and California cases, but to say whether he was in negotiations with Toyota and was rejected.

Toyota has held a series of high-profile sudden acceleration cases. Late last year agreed to pay $1.6 billion to a class-action lawsuit to solve case filed by Toyota and Lexus owners who claims, the issue reduces the value of their vehicles.

In addition, the automaker paid $10 million end of 2010 a suit with California Highway Strip Polizist, together with his family in a fiery 2009 crash harrowing detail in a 911 recording captured late pay.

Read More

Toyota expects US speed up case after $3 million judgment

Oct 25 (Reuters) - Toyota Motor Corp. reached a lawsuit in the United States about unintended acceleration problems to solve, one day after a jury the Japanese carmaker is liable a deal on Friday and found defects to pay child causes $3 million for a fatal accident in 2007.

A jury in Oklahoma on Thursday ordered the company to pay $3 million damages to Jean Bookout, a driver, the 2007 crash and the family of Barbara Schwarz, who was killed, injured. Jurors were planned, again advises on Friday whether to award punitive damages against Toyota.

Before the jury could reach a decision, Toyota announced, and lawyers for the plaintiffs reached a confidential settlement on damages of any kind, to resolve the case.

The dispute is to address one of the first with acceleration issues to court, as similar concerns Toyota 2009 to recall millions of vehicles to prompted. The suit alleges that defects in the software in the electronic throttle control system of Sulu's 2005 Camry caused it accelerate out of control and crash to kill black.

"While we strongly with the ruling did not agree, we are satisfied that the parties resolve a settlement agreed to in this case" Toyota spokeswoman Carly Schaffner said in a statement.

A lawyer for the plaintiffs, J. Cole Portis, said, welcomes the decision of the jury. "We are convinced that Toyota behavior from the time the electronic throttle control system developed, was a disgrace," said Portis in a statement. "We appreciate that the jury has had the courage to let Toyota and the public know that Toyota was reckless."

The case is the first defeat for Toyota in a number of early studies on questions of acceleration, which prompted hundreds of lawsuits across the country in the wake of the recalls. The Camry 2005 goes in the trial Oklahoma was not included in the recalls.

In two earlier trials in Brooklyn, New York and California, Toyota of the warranty acquitted alleged acceleration-like.

Were about 200 proposed class-action lawsuits and more than 500 individual cases filed against Toyota since February 2009 about the alleged acceleration problems according to a regulatory filing by the company.

Toyota has already agreed to a settlement worth $1.6 billion claims for economic losses, such as cost or lowered resale value, to repair to solve issues of the acceleration. The settlement not on personal injury or wrongful execution.

Read More

Unintended acceleration study blames older women

A new study from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found nearly two-thirds of drivers involved in unintended acceleration accidents were female. NBC's Brian Williams reports.

By Paul A. Eisenstein, The Detroit Bureau

When the National Academy of Sciences earlier this year ruled out the likelihood of unknown electronic gremlins causing so-called unintended acceleration problems with Toyota vehicles, researchers instead suggested that driver error was largely to blame.

A new study echoes the likelihood that drivers may hit the throttle when intending to reach for the brake – while also saying the majority of such accidents involve older women and occur primarily in parking lots.  But the report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also points the finger at drivers under 20.

Particularly striking is the finding that nearly two-thirds of the drivers involved in accidents involving the misuse of the gas pedal are female. In all motor vehicles crashes, nearly two in three drivers are male, NHTSA reports.

“The most consistent finding across data sources was the striking overrepresentation of females in pedal misapplication crashes, relative to their involvement in all types of crashes,” the study’s authors declared in an executive summary.  “Females were the drivers in nearly two-thirds of the pedal misapplication crashes” included in the study.

NHTSA Calls for Brake-Throttle Override Systems

 The federal agency is now proposing new regulations that would require automakers to install brake-throttle override systems.  These would automatically cut power to the engine in the event a motorist inadvertently depressed both the brake and throttle at the same time.  A number of manufacturers have begun installing such systems voluntarily, including Toyota which recalled millions of vehicles in 2009 and 2010 due to unintended acceleration problems.

“We learned as part of the comprehensive NASA and NHTSA studies of high-speed unintended acceleration that brake override systems could help drivers avoid crashes,” said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland.

Not all unintended acceleration issues are the result of driver error. The first Toyota recall was related to what was dubbed “carpet entrapment,” where loose floor mats could inadvertently jam the throttle open. The second was the result of a potentially sticky throttle linkage. But a series of subsequent studies ruled out electronic malfunctions and evidence in a number of reported unintended acceleration incidents supported the idea of driver error.  In one New York crash authorities found the driver had pressed so hard on the accelerator, thinking it was the brake, its metal linkage was bent.

Why do women in particular have such a high incident of brake misapplication incidents?

The authors noted, “Possible explanations might include greater exposure by women where these crashes occur most often (parking lots); a poorer “fit” in their cars due to shorter stature, which may increase the likelihood of a pedal application error; or a disproportionately high rate of one or more functional deficits that contribute to pedal errors, such as neuropathy.”

The new NHTSA study reveals that the misapplication of pedals leading to a crash occurs most frequently among drivers over 76 years of age, with those under 20 the second most likely age group to experience the problem.  And researchers suggest that may be the result of problems in the area of the brain that handle executive functioning – which are responsible for tasks like choosing which pedal to depress.

Just 21 of 98 Vehicles Pass Child Safety Seats Test

Other studies have found that the areas of the brain responsible for such decisions don’t fully form until around age 25 – while those regions also show declining functionality in the elderly.

The new NHTSA study was based on several sources including analysis of 2,400 gas pedal incidents in North Carolina – as well as an analysis of 900 news reports of unintended acceleration crashes.  In the North Carolina state database 57% of such crashes occurred in driveways, parking structures or parking lots.  That jumped to 77% in the news reports.

The study, conducted by the University of North Carolina’s Highway Safety Research Center, and TransAnalytics, an independent research firm in Pennsylvania, suggested drivers have more time to correct pedal mistakes made on the open road.

Read More

Drivers again faulted over Toyota acceleration

A two-year study looking for possible causes behind Toyota’s rash of unintended acceleration issues has put primary blame on driver error — but the review by the National Academy of Sciences also cautioned that some problems may have been caused by inadvertent interactions involving vehicle electronics — an issue frequently cited by the automaker’s critics.

Though there was no hard evidence of specific electronic defects, the 139-page report cautioned that “the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.” Warning electronic faults may be “untraceable,” it calls for stricter government involvement in setting standards for the use of electronic control vehicle systems.

The new report completes a series of studies set in motion by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration which, in March 2010, asked both the NAS’s National Research Council, as well as NASA, to see why there were so many complaints about what the media was referring to as “runaway Toyotas.”

The problem first made headlines in the summer of 2009, when a California Highway Patrol Officer and several members of his family were killed in a fiery crash involving a Lexus they had borrowed. The maker initially recalled several million vehicles due to a problem it described as “carpet entrapment,” but in January 2010 it added millions more due to a potentially sticky accelerator linkage.

Ultimately, more than 8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles were recalled in the U.S. alone. But the NHTSA received numerous additional complaints — with plaintiffs’ attorneys lining up to file lawsuits against the automaker — alleging some unknown electronic gremlin was also at work.

Last February, the NASA panel issued its report, contending it had found no indication of electronic defects. The National Research Council study echoes that, putting the primary blame on driver error. That had been the conclusion of other investigators in a number of instances — in one, police investigators found that a woman driver involved in a crash had been pressing on the gas pedal, rather than the brake, so hard she had bent its linkage.

Nonetheless, the latest study does not rule out electronic issues, which it cautioned can result in “untraceable faults,” with no physical evidence — other than a crash — to show when there might have been a problem such as a momentary software glitch.

“Some failures of software and other faults in electronics systems do not leave physical evidence of their occurrence, which can complicate assessment of the causes of unusual behaviors in the modern, electronics-intensive automobile,” the report cautioned.

Nonetheless, Louis Lanzerotti, the chairman of the panel and a New Jersey Institute of Technology physics professor, said during a conference call that, “All the data available to us indicated the conclusion that there was no electronic or software problem” that may have caused the Toyota unintended acceleration reports.”

The new study called for a number of steps to be taken to reduce the likelihood that electronic hardware and software do cause problems in the future – a critical issue considering the increasing use of digital technology in modern automobiles. Among the recommendations:

NHTSA should convene an advisory panel to set uniform industry testing standards for electronic systems; New vehicles should be equipped with aircraft-style black boxes to make it easier to trace and identify defects; Regulators need to continue research on pedal design and placement.

The study also called for closer cooperation between NHTSA’s researchers and the Transportation Department’s Office of Defect Investigations.

While some critics questioned the latest study — as they did earlier NHTSA and NASA findings, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said that in his eyes the latest report “does close the book” on the Toyota scandal.

At one point, following the second unintended acceleration recall, LaHood had said owners of Toyota vehicles involved in the recalls might think about parking those products until they were repaired.

The NHTSA ultimately levied a series of record fines against Toyota, including one for $33 million for delaying action on the sticky accelerator problem.

The maker, long known for seemingly bullet-proof quality, also recalled products in 2009, 2010 and 2011 for a variety of other issues, ranging from electronic brake issues with its Prius hybrid to excessive corrosion that could cause metal parts to fell off while driving the Sienna minivan.

As a result, Toyota had more recalls than any other maker in the U.S. market in 2009 and 2010, and with 3.5 million vehicles involved in service campaigns in 2011, came in just behind Honda, which last year recalled 3.7 million vehicles.

The long-term impact to the company’s reputation is unclear. Toyota — along with Honda — was one of only two major makers to suffer a sales decline in 2011. Analysts put most of the blame on the March earthquake and tsunami that severely limited global production for much of the year, but they also note cool consumer response to the latest update of the Toyota Camry at the same time as competitors like Ford are becoming increasingly aggressive in market segments long dominated by Toyota.

A new study by KBB.com shows that Toyota has regained its long-standing position as having the highest loyalty rate in the industry. But the maker is still heavily dependent on “conquesting” buyers from other brands. That, many analysts warn, could become more difficult in light of the hits Toyota’s reputation has taken.

Copyright 2012 The Detroit Bureau. All rights reserved.

Read More