Tuesday, January 31, 2012

GM reclaims global sales crown

GM reclaims global sales crown
Gm / Wieck


Strong global demand for the Chevrolet Cruze helped propel GM to the top of the automotive heap.


By Paul A. Eisenstein, The Detroit Bureau


Less than three years after emerging from bankruptcy General Motors is positioned to once again be the world’s number one automaker, with sales for 2011 totaling 9.03 million. Its largest brand Chevrolet, meanwhile, reported an all-time record of 4.76 million sales to close out its 100th anniversary.


GM’s victory celebration will have to wait for Toyota to confirm its 2011 numbers.  The Japanese giant had toppled its U.S. rival as global king-of-the-hill three years ago but it lost 100s of thousands of units of production in 2011 due to the impact of the March 11 Japanese earthquake and tsunami.


For the first three quarters of last year, Toyota deliveries were off 8.8%, to 5.77 million, and though it had hoped to pick up lost momentum in the fourth quarter its plans were again set back by subsequent flooding in Thailand.  Preliminary figures suggest it will end 2011 with 7.9 million sales, down about 6% for the full year.


That is likely to mean that Volkswagen AG will squeak into second place, with total sales of 8.39 million for the year.  The German maker has set a goal of global sales leadership, however, by 2018.


Why VW wants to get there is a question analyst Aaron Bragman, of IHS Automotive, says he doesn’t fully understand.  It gets you bragging rights, the analyst says, “But that’s about it. Being biggest in the world is not necessarily an advantage to anyone.  GM was number one for something like 75 years and then went into bankruptcy.”


What is “far more important,” Bragman cautions, “is sustainable profitability.”


That’s not to say size doesn’t matter.  Bigger volume translates into greater economies of scale, which is why the top three makers – as well as rivals like Fiat/Chrysler and Nissan – push for volume.  In some cases, a manufacturer can sidestep the need to drive up its own sales by entering into alliances or joint ventures.  Nissan, for example, has a close partnership with France’s Renault, while it has also been expanding a series of joint ventures with Germany’s Daimler – the two announcing this month plans to jointly produce engines at a plant in Decherd, Tennessee.


Nonetheless, the latest industry sales numbers can’t simply be dismissed.  For GM, they symbolize a significant recovery since the maker lost the sales crown shortly before having to enter Chapter 11 protection.


In particular, the tally underscores the U.S. maker’s increasing focus on markets outside of its traditional hub in North America.  Nearly three out of four GM vehicles were sold, last year, in markets ranging from China to the Czech Republic.


And a growing number of them wore the Chevrolet badge.  Chevy has traditionally been the largest of the GM brands but, until recently, it focused on the Americas, leaving the rest of the world to German-based Opel (and, in China, to Buick).  In recent years, GM has been downplaying the troubled Opel and turning to Chevrolet to do the global heavy lifting.  Much of its growth has been organic, but in 2011 GM abandoned the Daewoo nameplate and rebadged the Korean brand’s products as Chevys.


While foreign sales typically don’t generate the revenues and margins of products sold in the U.S., GM saw its earnings during just the first nine months of 2011 surge to $8.47 billion, up from $6.17 billion in 2010.  The maker had lost tens of billions in the years leading up to its bankruptcy.


As for Toyota, the Japanese automaker has laid out its own aggressive goals, but the push to reach 10 million sales annually will likely be delayed by several years, at the least, analysts caution.


In fact, Bragman believes Toyota could find it much more difficult to regain the industry lead than it has indicated.


“I don’t buy into the idea they’ll come roaring back,” he said. “They’re going to have a fight on their hands” as GM pushes to maintain its momentum while VW marches forward in its own bid for world domination.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Picking tomorrow’s top collector cars

Picking tomorrow’s top collector cars
AP


An event like the summer's Pebble Beach Concours d'Elegance might still focus on vehicles from the pre-War golden era of coach building.


By Paul A. Eisenstein


Okay, just maybe a Saab 9-4X might turn out to be something rare a decade from now considering how few rolled off the assembly line before the Swedish automaker went belly-up. But we’re having a hard time believing that something from the final year of the Pontiac Aztek will ever count as having a “collector car” in your garage.


The reality is that there are an awful lot of different products on the market, and plenty more used vehicles you can choose from.  So, if you were really interested in starting a hobby as a collector – and didn’t have a seven-figure nest egg to tap – where would you begin.


Luckily, we’ve got some friends in the right places, notably including McKeel Hagerty, the CEO of Hagerty Insurance, to lend some help.  Don’t bother to question his bona fides.  His firm is one of the largest in the business serving automotive collectors and that means he’s got the data to show what’s trending up.


Haggerty is out in Scottsdale, Arizona this weekend where he and thousands of other collectors and wannabes will be raising their paddles on bidding at a series of classic car events including the annual  Barrett-Jackson Auction.  It’s an easy time to get auction fever, letting emotions overcome common sense – something auctioneers are counting on as they work a crowd to fever pitch.


“It is easy to get caught up in all the high dollar sales that take place at auctions and wonder what interesting vehicles are still easily attainable,” Haggerty cautioned during a seminar on “Emerging Collectibles.”


Experts caution that it takes some real homework to know when to bid and when to sit on your hands.  And one thing that helps is to know what the hot emerging segments are.  Here are three Haggerty highlights:

Classic Pick-Ups.  Traditionally, trucks were run til they rusted into the ground, but B. Mitchell Carlson, a panelist in the Emerging Collectibles seminar, asserted that, “From Maine to San Diego, trucks are hot” with collectors;Early Japanese Cars. A lot of the original Japanese imports “were used up and thrown away,” said panelist Rob Sass, who laughed that for someone who can now find a well-preserved Honda S800 or early Toyota Celica, “they are bringing tremendous money”;If cars aren’t your thing, consider a classic motorcycle, a corner of the collector market that is rapidly heating up, according to motorcycle historian Paul Duchene.

“If you think cars are an emotional purchase, wait until you purchase a vintage bike,” he suggested.


One thing that seems to hold true, year-after-year, decade-after-decade, is that collectors tend to go after the vehicles they either drove or lusted for when they were young.  An event like the summer’s Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance might still focus on vehicles from the pre-War golden era of coach building.  But the bulk of collectors have moved on to post-War and now the muscle car era.


If Hagerty is right, we could be in for yet another shift in the coming years.

Sunday, January 29, 2012

KIA recalls 146,000 U.S. vehicles for airbag problem

Kia Motors said that it is reminds 145.755 Optima sedans and Rondo crossover vehicles in the United States because of the potentially defective drivers, the airbags.


Affected the model years 2006-2008 Optimas and 2007-2008 the Rondo, are Kia Motors America said in a statement on Monday.


Kia Motors America, a unit of the KIA Motors Corp., said that any injuries or airbags deploy it not because of the problem is.


95.569 Optimas and 50.186 Rondos are affected.


KIA, a subsidiary of Hyundai Motor Co, said that the clock contact spring Assembly for the driver's side airbag additional restraint system in the course of time can damage, may cause the driver's airbag not to the provide.


The recall is expected to start in March, said KIA.


Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters.

Saturday, January 28, 2012

Automakers step up their game for Super Bowl

Automakers step up their game for Super Bowl
Kia


Kia will use supermodel Adriana Lima, right, rock legends Motley Crue, left, and former UFC champion Chuck Liddell in their Super Bowl spot this year.


By Dan Carney


There was angst in some quarters last weekend when the New York Giants defeated the Green Bay Packers, ensuring that the reigning Super Bowl champions won’t be returning this year.


I don’t know what show Packers fans saw last year, but what most of us clearly remember is Volkswagen dealing its competitors a stunning blow with their “The Force” commercial featuring a pint-sized Darth Vader. And VW will most assuredly return to this year’s extravaganza.


Super Bowl commercials cost advertisers $3.5 million for 30 seconds of air time this year, according to industry trade publication AdWeek, and some of the epic car commercials will run 60 seconds. The contenders take the field against one another in pursuit of the glory that comes with victory before an expected viewing audience of 110 million.


VW heads a roster of car companies advertising during the big game, including Chrysler, whose incredible “Imported From Detroit” commercial with Eminem would have otherwise been the big winner, and Audi, whose “Green Police” spot was among the top 2010 spots from the game.


The champs from VW are confident in their new 60-second spot.


“Last year’s Super Bowl campaign was an overwhelming success for the brand,” noted Brian Thomas, VW’s General Manager of Brand Marketing. “We see this year’s Super Bowl as a great way to continue this success.”


Among the automakers hoping for a breakout performance this year are Chevrolet (and probably also Cadillac from GM), Honda, Acura, Hyundai, Kia, Lexus and Toyota. Any one of these companies would hope for a “The Force”-like victory.


GM is pulling out the stops to ensure it has this year’s talked-about commercial. The automaker has put together five spots this year, and it hasn’t even decided which five it will run, according to spokesman Pat Morrissey. Here’s hoping the company will steer clear of the sappy commercials it has tended to run in the past with its “Chevy Runs Deep” tagline.

Audi


Audi has advertised in the Super Bowl for five years.


Four of the commercials were created by GM’s ad agency, but the fifth will be crowdsourced from among more than 200 entries by amateur filmmakers. We can preview those spots at this website.


Volkswagen unleashed “The Force” online days before the game last year, so keep an eye out for a preview of that company’s spot.


Chevrolet introduced its Cruz compact car to the public with last year’s commercial — a model that contributed to Chevy reclaiming its spot as the top-selling car brand in the U.S. last year, said Morrissey.


Audi has advertised in the Super Bowl for five years, and over that time the company has achieved record sales, record brand strength and higher transaction prices, according to Scott Keogh, Audi’s chief marketing officer. Audi returns this year with a 60-second spot that highlights the LED headlights on the upcoming S7 model.


“The Super Bowl is unique in modern American advertising,” observed Steve Shannon, vice president of marketing for Hyundai. “It provides a huge audience and one that actually likes to watch the ads,” he said. “What could be better?”


Hyundai’s sister brand Kia will use supermodel Adriana Lima, rock legends Motley Crue and former UFC champion Chuck Liddell in their spot this year, said Michael Sprague, vice president of marketing and communications for Kia.


“After last year’s game, online search activity for the Optima increased 700 percent while online consideration increased 255 percent, so we know it’s the marketing event of the year in terms of reaching a mass audience and capturing their attention,” Spraugue said.


It is that ongoing interaction with potential buyers that sets Super Bowl advertising apart from other commercials, explained Keogh.


“With Audi in the Super Bowl you get these secondary and tertiary benefits,” he said. “Afterward, we got two billion (web) impressions. Now with social media like Facebook and YouTube, you get a massive multiplier there. If we run this very same ad on CNBC in March, you will never get all that.”

Friday, January 27, 2012

GM creates digital windows on the world

GM creates digital windows on the world
GM


Foofu is an app that helps encourage creativity as children draw with their fingers on steamy windows.


By Paul A. Eisenstein, The Detroit Bureau


Game Boys and backseat monitors are “so five years ago,” suggests Tom Seder, a manager at the General Motors R&D labs.


Working with the Future Lab, at Israel’s Bezalel Academy of Art and Design, GM researchers are exploring ways to turn a car’s rear windows into interactive devices that could permit backseat passengers – children in particular – to have a more interesting experience while traveling.


According to GM, the Windows of Opportunity, or WOO, Project was inspired by studies showing that travelers often feel disconnected from the world outside.  The goal of the project isn’t to replace those Game Boys, iPads and seatback monitors as a way to play Mario Brothers, but to actually nurture curiosity about what’s beyond the passenger compartment.


 “Traditionally, the use of interactive displays in cars has been limited to the driver and front passenger, but we see an opportunity to provide a technology interface designed specifically for rear seat passengers,” said Seder. “Advanced windows that are capable of responding to vehicle speed and location could augment real world views with interactive enhancements to provide entertainment and educational value.”


GM asked students at Bezalel, Israel’s oldest institute for higher education, to come up with apps that could be presented on vehicle windows.  Among those they developed:

Otto, an animated character that helps children learn about what they see along the road;Foofu, an app that helps encourage creativity as children draw with their fingers on steamy windows;Spindow, an app that would let children in one car connect with kids in other parts of the world in real time; andPond, a similar app that would also connect children in different vehicles while letting them share music and messages.

“Projects like WOO are invaluable, because working with designers and scholars from outside of the automotive industry brings fresh perspective to vehicle technology development,” said Omer Tsimhoni, lab group manager for human-machine interface, GM Advanced Technical Center in Israel.


So-called “smart glass” is beginning to find a variety of applications in architecture and displays, and it was featured in the recent hit movie, Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol.  It had a much more limited use in Daimler’s Maybach line, where passengers could transition an optional roof panel from clear to translucent with the touch of a button.


For now, GM says it has no production plans for the smart glass system, but in today’s competitive automotive world, that could change rather quickly.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Ford salaried workers get bonuses, raises

Ford Motor Co will give bonuses and merit-based raises to salaried workers in the United States and Canada this spring, the first time the No. 2 U.S. automaker has paid out both since the onset of the financial crisis.


The company will offer an average 2.7 percent salary increase that is based largely on individual performance, Ford spokeswoman Marcey Evans said.


The raises will be effective April 1 and bonuses will paid in March, Evans added.


Mark Fields, who runs Ford's operations in North and South America, sent a note last week to 20,000 salaried employees in the United States and Canada confirming that both bonuses and merit pay increases will be offered.


Ford last offered both in 2008, when the U.S. automaker was in the early stages of its turnaround plan "One Ford" under Chief Executive Alan Mulally.


Then in the fall of 2008, investment Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy, sending global markets into a tailspin and pushing Ford's crosstown rivals General Motors Co and Chrysler Group LLC to the brink of collapse.


Ford, the only U.S. automaker not to take a federal bailout, paid neither bonuses nor pay increases in 2009.


In 2010, Ford offered only merit-based pay increases to salaried workers. Last year, salaried employees received a only a bonus.


Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Drivers again faulted over Toyota acceleration

A two-year study looking for possible causes behind Toyota’s rash of unintended acceleration issues has put primary blame on driver error — but the review by the National Academy of Sciences also cautioned that some problems may have been caused by inadvertent interactions involving vehicle electronics — an issue frequently cited by the automaker’s critics.


Though there was no hard evidence of specific electronic defects, the 139-page report cautioned that “the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.” Warning electronic faults may be “untraceable,” it calls for stricter government involvement in setting standards for the use of electronic control vehicle systems.


The new report completes a series of studies set in motion by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration which, in March 2010, asked both the NAS’s National Research Council, as well as NASA, to see why there were so many complaints about what the media was referring to as “runaway Toyotas.”


The problem first made headlines in the summer of 2009, when a California Highway Patrol Officer and several members of his family were killed in a fiery crash involving a Lexus they had borrowed. The maker initially recalled several million vehicles due to a problem it described as “carpet entrapment,” but in January 2010 it added millions more due to a potentially sticky accelerator linkage.


Ultimately, more than 8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicles were recalled in the U.S. alone. But the NHTSA received numerous additional complaints — with plaintiffs’ attorneys lining up to file lawsuits against the automaker — alleging some unknown electronic gremlin was also at work.


Last February, the NASA panel issued its report, contending it had found no indication of electronic defects. The National Research Council study echoes that, putting the primary blame on driver error. That had been the conclusion of other investigators in a number of instances — in one, police investigators found that a woman driver involved in a crash had been pressing on the gas pedal, rather than the brake, so hard she had bent its linkage.


Nonetheless, the latest study does not rule out electronic issues, which it cautioned can result in “untraceable faults,” with no physical evidence — other than a crash — to show when there might have been a problem such as a momentary software glitch.


“Some failures of software and other faults in electronics systems do not leave physical evidence of their occurrence, which can complicate assessment of the causes of unusual behaviors in the modern, electronics-intensive automobile,” the report cautioned.


Nonetheless, Louis Lanzerotti, the chairman of the panel and a New Jersey Institute of Technology physics professor, said during a conference call that, “All the data available to us indicated the conclusion that there was no electronic or software problem” that may have caused the Toyota unintended acceleration reports.”


The new study called for a number of steps to be taken to reduce the likelihood that electronic hardware and software do cause problems in the future – a critical issue considering the increasing use of digital technology in modern automobiles. Among the recommendations:

NHTSA should convene an advisory panel to set uniform industry testing standards for electronic systems; New vehicles should be equipped with aircraft-style black boxes to make it easier to trace and identify defects; Regulators need to continue research on pedal design and placement.

The study also called for closer cooperation between NHTSA’s researchers and the Transportation Department’s Office of Defect Investigations.


While some critics questioned the latest study — as they did earlier NHTSA and NASA findings, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said that in his eyes the latest report “does close the book” on the Toyota scandal.


At one point, following the second unintended acceleration recall, LaHood had said owners of Toyota vehicles involved in the recalls might think about parking those products until they were repaired.


The NHTSA ultimately levied a series of record fines against Toyota, including one for $33 million for delaying action on the sticky accelerator problem.


The maker, long known for seemingly bullet-proof quality, also recalled products in 2009, 2010 and 2011 for a variety of other issues, ranging from electronic brake issues with its Prius hybrid to excessive corrosion that could cause metal parts to fell off while driving the Sienna minivan.


As a result, Toyota had more recalls than any other maker in the U.S. market in 2009 and 2010, and with 3.5 million vehicles involved in service campaigns in 2011, came in just behind Honda, which last year recalled 3.7 million vehicles.


The long-term impact to the company’s reputation is unclear. Toyota — along with Honda — was one of only two major makers to suffer a sales decline in 2011. Analysts put most of the blame on the March earthquake and tsunami that severely limited global production for much of the year, but they also note cool consumer response to the latest update of the Toyota Camry at the same time as competitors like Ford are becoming increasingly aggressive in market segments long dominated by Toyota.


A new study by KBB.com shows that Toyota has regained its long-standing position as having the highest loyalty rate in the industry. But the maker is still heavily dependent on “conquesting” buyers from other brands. That, many analysts warn, could become more difficult in light of the hits Toyota’s reputation has taken.


Copyright 2012 The Detroit Bureau. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Minivans are innovating to survive

Minivans are innovating to survive
Rebecca Cook / Reuters


The Chrysler 700 C concept van is displayed at the 2012 Detroit auto show.


By Paul A. Eisenstein, msnbc.com contributor


Can the Chrysler 700 rekindle America’s love affair with the minivan? 


The swoopy concept vehicle now on display at the 2012 Detroit Auto Show is a visually striking contrast to the staidly functional “one-box” people-movers that most Americans are familiar with.


Generally given credit with inventing the modern minivan, Chrysler is hoping that the auto show car will give it a new direction that could revive the once vital market segment.


At their peak, models like the Chrysler Town & Country, Honda Odyssey and Ford Windstar accounted for about 8 percent of the U.S. new vehicle market. Without some breakthrough, that could soon slip to as little as 3 percent, according to a forecast by IHS Automotive.


“I don’t like the smell of the minivan market today,” said Chrysler’s CEO Sergio Marchionne, noting that he may kill off one of the carmaker’s remaining two models if a viable alternative, perhaps something like the 700, can’t be found to generate some enthusiasm in research clinics later this year.


At its peak, Chrysler had three different minivan models offered under its various brand names. General Motors and Ford also had an assortment of minivans, all now abandoned. And the market wasn’t any kinder to offerings from foreign marques like Hyundai, Kia and Volkswagen.


Only Toyota, with the Sienna, and Honda, with the Odyssey, are viable competitors to Chrysler today. But the minivan segment has shrunk so badly that none of the major automakers can really be described as seeing successful sales.


At the segment’s peak, in 2000, the car industry sold 1.37 million minivans, according to IHS Research Director Rebecca Lindland. That amount plunged to 415,000 in 2009, the industry’s overall worst year in decades. Minivan sales rebounded last year to 472,000, but demand is growing slower than for the industry as whole, which is why Lindland doesn’t expect the segment to capture more than 3 percent of the overall U.S. market going forward.


“It’s not a decline to nowhere, because as long as there are families there will be minivans,” Lindland said. But, she added, many families are looking for alternatives to minivans, trading functionality for style.



autoshow-tease
Stan Honda / AFP - Getty Images


Upscale sedans, electric vehicles and old-school muscle cars make their debuts at the 2012 North American International Auto show.


Some former minivan buyers have migrated to big SUVs, like Chevrolet’s Suburban and Tahoe models, but the big shift has been to crossover/utility vehicles, such as the Honda Pilot, which the automaker admits it specifically designed to attract traditional minivan customers.


How will automakers win back the lost customers?


“We need to redesign the van,” notes Chrysler’s CEO Marchionne, “and peel away the skin of the onion” to find what still works for the minivan customer and what is sending buyers scurrying to other product segments.


That’s not as easy as it seems because while conventional wisdom suggests the vehicles are primarily sold to families with young children, minivans have also had a strong appeal, over the years, to empty-nesters who want more space and flexibility than they could get in a sedan.


Ironically, some of the features that attract one minivan buyer -- kid-friendly sliding doors, for example -- could turn off other customers.


Ford discovered this issue when it abandoned its most recent minivan offering, the Freestar, and switched to an alternative concept it dubbed the “people-mover.” To make sure the wagon-like Ford Flex wasn’t confused with a minivan, the carmaker switched to using conventional rear doors, notes marketing chief Jim Farley. But that has actually limited the vehicle’s appeal to some buyers, especially those with young children.


Ford isn’t giving up. It has an updated version of the Flex coming to market and it is launching a downsized people-mover called the C-Max later this year, and it will be using sliding rear doors again. Ford hopes to enhance the appeal of the new model by offering it with a choice of either a conventional gas-electric drivetrain or the company’s first plug-in hybrid.


“When you talk to moms and dads they don’t necessarily want something sexy. They just want something practical,” Lindland said, noting that empty-nesters want something a little more stylish. The challenge, she concluded, “will be finding a way to market to both of them.”


Can the 700 bridge the age gap? Chrysler certainly hopes so. And it will be watching closely to see what the public’s reaction to the prototype is during the Detroit auto show and automotive events to follow.


Meanwhile, Chrysler’s designers are tinkering with other designs at the carmaker’s engineering center in the Detroit suburb of Auburn Hills. Marchionne wants several possible designs that the automaker can “take to [consumer] clinics by the end of this year,” he said.


There was a time when Chrysler controlled about two-thirds of the once-huge minivan market. Today it holds barely half of a much-humbled segment. Unless it’s confident it has a winner in hand it may stage an orderly retreat and settle for being a small participant in a shrinking niche.

Monday, January 23, 2012

2011 car sales end with a surge

2011 car sales end with a surge
Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images


Losing momentum: the new 2012 Toyota Camry.


By Joseph Szczesny, TheDetroitBureau.com


Countering earlier concerns about a double-dip recession, U.S. auto sales wrapped up a skittish 2011 on a positive note, surging in the final weeks of the year, with Detroit’s automakers helping drive the overall market to its highest level since the start of the long economic downturn.


Overall sales of new cars, trucks and crossovers increased by 10.2% during 2011, largely paced by a surge in demand for domestic brands. General Motors, Chrysler Group LLC and Ford Motor Co. all finished 2011 with double-digit increases over the previous year. Vollkswagen also reported a 26% gain for 2011 as its new lineup of cars – especially the American-made 2012 VW Passat – has clicked with customers.


Chrysler Group reported U.S. sales of 138,019 units, a 37% increase compared with sales in December 2010 and the group’s best monthly volume since May 2008.


Ford Motor Co. also reported a 16% increase, while GM reported a modest 5% increase.


For the year, Chrysler Group sales totaled 1.37 million units, up 26% versus sales in 2010, the largest percentage sales gain of any full-line manufacturer. The Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram Truck brands each posted solid sales gains during 2011 compared with 2010.


Ford sales finished 2011 with a 17% increase as the flagship “Blue Oval” brand saw sales top 2 million units for the first time since 2007.


Meanwhile, with Chevrolet gaining momentum from a variety of new and older models, GM reported a 14% increase.


“The year finished on a high note, with industry sales momentum strengthening as the year came to a close,” said Ken Czubay, Ford vice president, U.S. Marketing, Sales and Service. “We saw Ford sales strengthen as well, posting our best December retail sales month since 2005 and closing the year as America’s best-selling brand.”


Reid Bigland, Chrysler Group US Sales chief, noted December marked Chrysler Group’s 21st-consecutive month of year-over-year sales gains and seventh-consecutive month of sales increases of at least 20%.


“Chrysler Group finished a year of growth on a strong note with our December retail sales soaring 45% to our highest dealer retail sales in four years,” Bigland said.  “Looking back, we were the fastest-growing automaker in the country, increasing our market share 1.3%age points during 2011,” he said.


The group’s 37% December increase was driven in part by strong sales of the Chrysler 300 flagship sedan, Chrysler 200 mid-size sedan, Dodge Charger and Avenger sport sedans, Ram pickup truck, and the Jeep Grand Cherokee, Wrangler, and Compass.


Despite concerns about rising inventories, Chrysler Group finished the month with a comfortable 64-day supply of inventory (326,087 units). U.S. industry sales figures for December are projected at an estimated 14 million SAAR.


Royal Oak-based Saab Car USA also reported selling 270 vehicles, down significantly from the 1,074 units sold in December, 2010. However, Saab managed to increase its overall sales in the U.S. despite the financial troubles that forced it into bankruptcy.


Porsche Cars USA also reported a 15% increase in sales for 2011.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Americans keeping their autos longer than ever

Americans keeping their autos longer than ever
Elaine Thompson / AP


Traffic moves across the Highway 520 floating bridge in Medina, Wash. American drivers are holding on to their cars and trucks for longer, new data suggest.


By msnbc.com staff and wire


American drivers are holding on to their cars and trucks longer, new data suggest, as they put off buying new vehicles in the face of high unemployment and a struggling economy.


The average age of a vehicle on the road has climbed to a record 10.8 years, according to automotive research firm Polk. Last year the average vehicle on U.S. roads was 10.6 years old, up from 10 years in 2008, Polk said.


While the average age of passenger cars has shown a modest increase since 2010, rising from 11 years to just 11.1 years at the end of June 2011, light trucks (including pickups and SUVs) have seen a more sizeable gain, rising from 10.1 years to 10.4 years in the same timeframe. Overall, average vehicle age has risen quickly over the past five years, Polk said. The firm uses national vehicle registration data in its analysis.


Polk says the average vehicle age has been rising since 2008, but a rebound in vehicle sales last year is likely to slow the aging rate. Automakers sold 12.8 million vehicles in the U.S. last year, up from 11.6 million in 2010. Analysts expect auto sales to continue rising in 2012.


The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

Wheels to keep both parents and kids humming

Parenting magazine's Shawn Bean shows TODAY's Ann Curry three cars that are smart buys if you're looking for a family vehicle, equipped with sliding second-row seats, extra storage space and multimedia centers.


Chauffeuring kids around amid all the other responsibilities that parents face can be exhausting duty. To ease nerves and boost sales, automakers are offering vehicle-shopping parents an array of conveniences. Sifting through the latest models, Parenting magazine has come up with seven to suit just about everyone's taste — even those underage back-seat drivers.


Two of the seven featured in the magazine are:


Wheels to keep both parents and kids hummingCourtesy of GM Company


The Chevrolet Traverse can easily carry half your kid's soccer team.


Chevrolet Traverse
By the numbers: Three rows, up to eight seats, 17 mpg city/24 mpg highway


Carpool 2.0: Sliding second-row seats that children as young as 7 can operate. Play tunes on your smartphone through the sound system using wireless Bluetooth.


Mommy, I can do it: The seat belts are easy for kids to snap themselves into.


No sticky seats: The cup holders can accommodate juice boxes and sippy cups.


Price: From $29,510; chevrolet.com


2012_Toyota_Prius Courtesy of Toyota Motor Corp.


The Prius V has plenty of room in the back — just don't forget the kids.


Toyota Prius V
By the numbers: Five seats, 67 cubic feet of storage with the rear seatbacks down (that's approximately 98 paper grocery bags), 44 mpg city/40 mpg highway


Appy family: The dashboard doubles as a tablet. Toyota's Entune multimedia system lets you use the in-dash touchscreen to tune in to The Muppets station on Pandora, search Bing for the nearest Pinkberry, or get live traffic reports.


parenting-mag

Price: From $26,400; toyota.com


Of course, now you just have to find that middle ground between the wheels you want and the one the kids want.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Vehicles that give the best bang for the bucks

It’s tempting to assume only the smallest, cheapest cars offer the most value.


To an extent that’s true, but owning a car costs money in a lot of ways. Less obvious costs like depreciation, interest on a loan, repair and maintenance costs can outweigh the savings from a low sticker price, a big customer rebate and high gas mileage.


That’s where Vincentric LLC comes in. Vincentric, based in Bingham Farms, Mich., analyzes ownership costs for automotive fleets and other users. Based on historical data, they forecast ownership costs including transaction prices, depreciation, fuel costs, repairs, interest, fees and taxes, insurance, maintenance — even an “opportunity cost” for how much you could make if you invested your money in something else.


“It’s important to look at how much it costs, not just to own, but to own and operate,” said Vincentric President David Wurster.


Taking all those factors into account, and the fact that since the recession owners are keeping their cars longer, Vincentric recently estimated total costs for a five-year ownership period.


Forbes asked Vincentric to sort the results, to identify cars with both the lowest possible costs and an overall “Excellent” rating from Vincentric. The resulting list includes pint-sized cars like the Honda Fit, but it also turned up a couple of gasoline-electric hybrids from Toyota, a diesel sedan from Volkswagen, a Toyota pickup truck, and even a small delivery van from Ford.


That’s surprising because the knock on hybrids – and diesels — is that depending on how long you hang onto them, they’re too expensive upfront to justify the fuel savings over time. Vincentric shows that view may be outdated.


The Vincentric results also show that gasoline-powered internal combustion engines can deliver much higher fuel economy than we’re used to seeing, using high-tech measures like modern four-cylinder engines with gasoline direct injection, six-speed automatic transmissions that get better mileage than manuals, and even low rolling-resistance tires.


There’s more than one way for owners to get the best bang for the buck.


© 2012 Forbes.com

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Battery cars face an uphill climb to acceptance

Battery cars face an uphill climb to acceptance
David Mcnew / Reuters


A 2011 Chevy Volt is seen at a dealership in Northridge, Calif.


By Paul A. Eisenstein


A spectacular flop, or just a slow start? 


One thing is certain, the battery car is going to have to gain some serious momentum if it’s going to have a real impact on the U.S. automotive market -- or come anywhere close to meeting the White House’s target of putting 1.5 million battery-powered cars on the road by mid-decade.


Despite widespread coverage in both the automotive and mainstream media – and the introduction of a number of new models – battery cars barely showed up as a rounding error on the automotive sales charts in 2011, plug-in hybrids and pure battery-electric vehicles collectively generating less than 18,000 sales, or about as many Accord sedans Honda sold in December alone.


Proponents insist that the technology shouldn’t be measured by 2011 results and will need a few years to build momentum, particularly to see the sort of improvements in cost and range needed to become more directly competitive with the time-tested internal combustion engine. 


But skeptics are questioning whether so much money and effort should be focused on battery power when there are other potential alternatives to the combustion engine in the offing.


“This is how the auto industry itself started out 125 years ago, taking very slow, stuttering steps,” cautioned Rebecca Lindland, research chief with IHS Automotive. While some of her colleagues have dubbed the battery car a failure, she says it’s “too early to panic.”


The year ended with the much-ballyhooed Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid (Chevy prefers “extended-range electric vehicle”) logging just short of 8,000 sales. The carmaker insists it actually met its goal of building 10,000 Volts, but it clearly fell short of its plan to sell that many last year. Early in 2011 Nissan crowed about logging over 20,000 advance deposits for its electric Nissan Leaf but barely reached 10,000 in sales. Again, the carmaker considers that a success.


Others aren’t so upbeat. 


“I’d say they failed,” proclaimed Joe Phillippi, chief analyst with AutoTrends Consulting.


Phillippi also admits it may be too early to write battery cars off entirely. Consider the experience of the Toyota Prius, today the world’s most successful conventional hybrid-electric vehicle. When it made its debut a decade ago it sold less than 6,000 units in its first year on the U.S. market. But last year it was the world’s best-selling hybrid and accounted for roughly half of gas-electric model sales in the United States.


Then again, add all hybrids together and sales totaled just 274,927 last year, or barely 2.1 percent of the 12.78 million cars, light trucks and crossovers sold in the U.S. in 2011.


Tesla Motors founder and Chairman Elon Musk insists the electric side of the industry will slowly ramp up as batteries get better and costs come down. He points to the California-based start-up’s new Model S sedan, due later this year, which will offer buyers a choice of 160-, 230- and even a 300-mile battery pack. Currently, most models get less than 100 miles per charge.


Ford’s global product chief Derrick Kuzak is not quite as enthusiastic about electric cars, but he’s still an advocate, suggesting Ford’s goal is “to drive up scale” to bring down costs and improve the limiting factors of an electric vehicle, like range and charging times.


Ford has just launched a lithium-ion-powered version of its Focus model and, in the coming months, will add both conventional hybrid and plug-in versions of the new C-Max “people mover.” There will be no gas-only version.


Kuzak expects battery power to account for anywhere between 10 and 25 percent of the car market by 2020, with factors ranging from technological breakthroughs to government mandates impacting the actual tally. He cautions that Ford anticipates conventional hybrids will account for three-quarters of all battery-based vehicle sales, followed by plug-ins and then battery-electric vehicles, or BEVs.


The numbers could actually become notably larger if one were to include more basic battery-based technologies -- such as start-stop, which briefly shuts off a vehicle’s engine instead of letting it idle, and then automatically restarts the engine when the driver’s foot lifts off the brake. Many experts predict that feature alone could become near-ubiquitous by 2020.


Part of the problem for the battery car is that the aging internal combustion engine is getting so good. 


Emissions are barely 1 percent of what they were before government regulations were first enacted in the 1960s. The latest turbochargers, direct injection and advanced transmission systems are yielding phenomenal improvements in fuel efficiency, even as they boost performance.


But these improvements to the internal combustion engine likely won’t be enough, according to Lindland, who notes that government fuel economy mandates will require a host of solutions.


“There’s a lot of activity around the world that suggests people realize the battery isn’t the only way to get there, however,” stressed Peter Hoffmann, editor and publisher of the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Letter.


Fuel cell technology is sometimes referred to as the refillable battery because it uses hydrogen to create electric current that can run the same electric motors as a battery car. The only exhaust gas is pure water vapor.


But there are numerous problems producing, distributing and storing hydrogen, and that has led the Obama administration to initially shift research dollars away to battery development. Recently, however, the Department of Energy has put more money back into hydrogen efforts.


That reflects what is happening in other parts of the world, notably in Germany, where the government has laid out long-term plans for a network of perhaps 1,000 hydrogen refilling stations along the nation’s vaunted Autobahns. (Those stations would also feature battery chargers.)


A new study by KPMG, based on responses from 200 auto industry leaders, shows that eight in 10 anticipate increased research spending on various electric vehicle componentry. Much of that investment could go toward fuel cell vehicles, too. And the study found 65 percent expect more spending on fuel cell research.


There are other possible solutions, including advanced diesel power. Current applications already account for about half of the vehicles on the road in Europe. There are also novel uses of compressed air, rather than batteries, for storing energy in hybrid vehicles.


The coming year will see a flood of new hybrids and more advanced lithium-based vehicles coming to market. Indeed, it will be the rare carmaker that won’t have a battery car on the road over the next two to three years. Whether consumers will reward or ignore them remains to be seen.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Ford to open a lab in Silicon Valley

Ford to open a lab in Silicon Valley
Mike Blake / Reuters


Ford Flex vehicles at a Ford dealership in Tustin, Calif.


By The Associated Press


Ford Motor Co. is the latest automaker to open a research lab in Silicon Valley, where it hopes to scout out new technology and keep ahead of trends.


The company said Friday that it plans to open the lab near Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif., in the first few months of this year. It will employ around 15 people, including some recruited locally and others who will rotate in from Ford's headquarters in Dearborn.


Ford's Chief Technical Officer Paul Mascarenas said the company decided about a year ago that it needed a bigger presence in Silicon Valley.


"This is a very natural extension into one of the most innovative communities in the world," he said.


He said the lab will work on ways to better integrate phones and other personal devices into cars, as well as safety systems that alert drivers when they're approaching another car.


The lab will also solicit and test applications from independent programmers. One app Ford is currently studying can find an open parking space and reserve it. Another would improve weather reporting by transmitting signals when a car's rain-sensing wipers are triggered.


Mascarenas said the lab will also study larger issues, including population growth in developing countries like China and India, and how best to handle traffic in those countries.


The lab will work with Ford headquarters as well as its design studio in Southern California and its office at Microsoft Corp. in Washington. Microsoft and Ford jointly developed Ford's Sync voice-activated entertainment system and My Ford Touch touch-screen dashboard.


But Mascarenas said it's important that the lab be in Silicon Valley — not Dearborn — so employees feel free to experiment.


Ford joins several other automakers that have similar offices in Silicon Valley, including General Motors Co., BMW AG and the Renault-Nissan alliance.


K. Venkatesh Prasad, a senior technical leader at Ford who will commute between Dearborn and the new office, said Ford considered opening a Silicon Valley office in the past but the technology wasn't ready. Now, he said, the Sync platform makes it easier and faster to reprogram the car and update it with new applications. Ford introduced Sync four years ago.


"The car is finally a platform," Prasad said.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Mercedes apologizes for using Che Guevara image

Mercedes apologizes for using Che Guevara image
Daimler AG


Dieter Zetsche, head of the Mercedes-Benz unit of Daimler AG, revealed the controversial ad during a presentation Tuesday at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.


Updated at 8:30 p.m. ET: Daimler AG apologized Thursday for using an image of Marxist revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara during a promotional presentation for Mercedes-Benz cars.


The image briefly appeared Tuesday during a presentation by Dieter Zetsche, head of Daimler's Mercedes unit, at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. It reproduced a famous Alberto Korda photo of Guevara, the Argentine communist who spearheaded the revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power in Cuba. The photo became a symbol of communist revolutionary movements during the 1960s and '70s. 


But in place of the star that adorns Guevara's beret in the original, Mercedes affixed its corporate logo.


Activists reacted with horror to the appropriation of Guevara, whom many political conservatives and Cuban-Americans consider a mass murderer who helped subjugate Cuba.


"Mercedes-Benz Uses Communist Madman Che Guevara to Sell Luxury Cars," said the headline on a blog post from the Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative political organization in Washington.


"Che Guevara, not to put too fine a point on it, was a psychopath whose sadistic lust for blood was not easily quenched. He killed for pleasure," said the post, written by Heritage Vice President Mike Gonzalez.


In a statement Thursday to msnbc.com, Daimler said the image was just "one of many images and videos in the presentation," which it said was intended to represent "the revolution in automobility enabled by new technologies, in particular those associated with connectivity."


"Daimler was not condoning the life or actions of this historical figure or the political philosophy he espoused," the company said, adding: "We sincerely apologize to those who took offense."


Daimler's statement was welcomed by Ernesto Suarez, who organized an online petition calling for Mercedes-Benz to apologize for using the image of a man the petition called "a racist, homophobic, anti-semitic and tyrannical killer who admitted in his own writing to his endless blood thirst."


"I'm very satisfied with the reaction from Mercedes-Benz," Suarez, a Cuban-American who lives in Kansas City, Mo., told msnbc.com Thursday evening. "I believe that they have done the right thing.


"The victory, if there is one, is not mine, but belongs to the descendants of [Guevara's] victims [and] the survivors, to common sense and to civility," he said.


Here's Daimler's full statement to msnbc.com:



In his keynote speech at CES, Dr. Zetsche addressed the revolution in automobility enabled by new technologies, in particular those associated with connectivity. To illustrate this point, the company briefly used a photo of revolutionary Che Guevara (it was one of many images and videos in the presentation). Daimler was not condoning the life or actions of this historical figure or the political philosophy he espoused. We sincerely apologize to those who took offense.

Monday, January 16, 2012

GM to fortify electric Volts amid fire risk

GM to fortify electric Volts amid fire risk
Bill Pugliano / Getty Images


By msnbc.com news services


General Motors plans to ask Volt owners to bring their electric cars into dealers to strengthen the structure around the batteries.


The automaker said Thursday it plans enhancements to the vehicle’s structure and battery coolant system to further protect the 400-pound lithium-ion battery from the possibility of an electrical fire occurring days or weeks after a severe crash.


The enhancements come in response to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Preliminary Evaluation to examine post-severe crash battery performance. 


The move is similar to a recall and involves all the Volts sold in the U.S. in the past two years. The repair will take two to three hours to complete, Mark Reuss, GM's chief of North American operations, said. GM has built about 12,400 of the battery-powered Volts, according to Reuters. Chevy sold 7,671 Volts last year, missing its goal of selling 10,000 Volts.


The call back comes after three batteries caught fire after side-impact crash tests done by federal safety regulators. The fires occurred seven days to three weeks after the tests and have been blamed on a coolant leak that caused an electrical short. No fires have broken out in real-world crashes.


Volt customers will be individually notified when the modifications are available for their vehicles. The enhancements are being incorporated into the Volt manufacturing process as production resumes this month, GM said.


Reuss said he was "optimistic" that the proposed Volt remedies would address NHTSA's concerns.


According to the automaker, the modifications will:

Strengthen an existing portion of the Volt’s vehicle safety structure to further protect the battery pack in a severe side collision.Add a sensor in the reservoir of the battery coolant system to monitor coolant levels.Add a tamper-resistant bracket to the top of the battery coolant reservoir to help prevent potential coolant overfill.

The repairs are a step below a formal recall.


GM said it conducted four successful crash tests between Dec. 9 and 21 of Volts with the structural enhancement. The enhancement performed as intended and there was no intrusion into the battery pack and no coolant leakage in any of the tests, the automaker said in a statement.


GM has made the Volt the symbol of its determination to seize a leadership position in fuel economy and green technology, and its engineers have been racing to respond to a safety investigation by U.S. regulators since late last year.


"This remains a halo vehicle for us in technology and design," Reuss said. 


The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Automakers vying for top honors in Detroit

Automakers vying for top honors in Detroit
Frederic J. Brown / AFP - Getty Images


The VW Passat is one of the finalists for car of the year.


By Paul A. Eisenstein, msnbc.com contributor


It’s automotive award season, so expect to see a lot of commercials touting cars, trucks and crossovers that are “best” in one category or another.


But few trophies carry the heft and credibility of the one that will be handed out following the opening ceremony of next week’s 2012 Detroit auto show.


Unlike most automotive awards, the winners of the North American Car and Truck of the Year (“NACTOY”) are decided by a panel of 50 U.S. and Canadian journalists. The methodology is designed to make sure that no single media outlet’s editorial -- or advertising -- policies influence the verdict.


The widely regarded, and oft-quoted, NACTOY is something most manufacturers actively and aggressively seek, so even landing among the finalists is considered a major victory -- or a serious setback if you’re left off the list.


And, for the first time in quite a while, there are no Japanese autos among the finalists for North American Car of the Year -- a potentially significant development when the major Asian carmakers seem more vulnerable than they have been in decades.


The car-of-the-year finalists -- the Ford Focus, the Hyundai Elantra and the Volkswagen Passat -- are nonetheless an international bunch. But surprisingly absent are two particular models that would, in years past, have been absolute shoe-ins, at least for inclusion among the finalists: the 2012 remakes of the Honda Civic and the Toyota Camry.


The choice of an American, Korean and a German car “reflects the fact that every manufacturer is getting better these days,” suggested Joe Phillippi, chief analyst with AutoTrends Consulting. At the same time the Civic and Camry “certainly don’t break new ground,” he said.


They’ve both taken a fair share of criticism in recent months. Honda’s CEO Takanobu Ito has promised to rush a major update of the new Civic to market as soon as possible. This will likely happen sometime in 2013, years before a replacement or even a mid-cycle freshening would normally be expected. The latest Civic came to market only last spring.


It’s difficult to say exactly how important winning a NACTOY trophy is beyond the bragging rights, though Ford President of the Americas Mark Fields described it as “a huge marketing opportunity for us and [one] we [would] definitely use to our advantage.”


It would also serve as “significant validation,” he added, for the carmaker’s One Ford strategy, which has seen a shift away from developing separate products for individual regions of the world in favor of a single product, like the Focus, that can be tweaked slightly to meet the needs of specific markets. 


Since about 80 percent of the components on a Focus are shared in all regions, that means much greater economies of scale. In turn, explained Fields, the strategy allows Ford to come up with a compact model that is not just more attractive, but also more lavishly equipped than past small car offerings.


That has proved particularly critical considering the growth of the compact segment. It’s one of the largest niches worldwide and among the fastest-growing in the U.S. as American buyers downsize to reduce their fuel bills.


In decades past, the compact segment was filled with boring and sparsely equipped “econoboxes.” Hyundai pitched its offerings by focusing on rock-bottom pricing. No longer. The Hyundai Elantra that is the second of the three NACTOY Car-of-the-Year finalists is a strikingly attractive and well-equipped offering that is helping the Korean carmaker transform its once-stodgy image.


No wonder, according to Dave Sullivan of AutoPacific: “The Koreans have clearly gained the respect of the Japanese as worthy competitors.”


If the Elantra were to win, it would be just the second NACTOY victory for the Koreans. The original Hyundai Genesis, the carmaker’s first foray into the luxury market, won four years ago.


The third contender for North American Car of the Year is perhaps the most “plain vanilla” when it comes to design, suggests long-time automotive author and analyst Mike Davis.


But it is no less significant. The 2012 Volkswagen Passat is the centerpiece of the German automaker’s plan to more than double its U.S. sales by 2018 -- and to become the world’s largest automaker by that date.


Significantly, the American Passat is bigger than the European version of the sedan -- so large is its interior tha it actually slips into the full-size category, with enough room for a squad of NBA players front and back. While it may not boast the edgy styling of the Focus or Elantra, the new midsize Passat is equally well-equipped and, perhaps most significant for buyers, it comes at a price tag thousands less than the model it replaced.


It’s also the first new product to roll out of VW’s new assembly plant in Chattanooga, Tenn.


A quick survey of the 50 NACTOY jurors suggests it will be a close race, with the Passat given an ever-so-slight edge.


As for the truck side of the NACTOY balloting, there’s another big surprise, with not a single American offering in the mix. But that is more a reflection of the unusually small number of light truck models introduced over the last 12 months. 


Ironically, then, Honda has landed a spot among the three finalists with its newly-updated CR-V crossover, with the other spots filled by the redesigned BMW X3 and Land Rover’s first-ever car-based crossover, the Range Rover Evoq.


The winners of the North American Car and Truck of the Year will be announced following the ribbon cutting at Detroit’s Cobo Center next Monday.


Note: Columnist Paul A. Eisenstein is a long-time member of the NACTOY jury.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

US automakers' 2011 sales show turnaround

US automakers
Scott Olson / Getty Images


Jeep vehicles are offered for sale at Marino Chrysler Jeep Dodge in Chicago, Illinois.


Detroit's Big Three automakers -- GM, Chrysler and Ford -- had a turnaround year in 2011. They are not so sanguine about 2012, however.


Chrysler said Wednesday its U.S. sales rose 26 percent last year, while Ford reported an 11 percent sales gain thanks to good demand for trucks and SUVs. GM said its U.S. sales rode 13 percent.


Chrysler ended the year with a 37 percent increase in December sales on strong demand for the Jeep Wrangler and Chrysler 200 sedan.


Ford sold 2.1 million vehicles last year, a sign of the industry's continuing recovery. It was the first time the Ford brand has passed the 2 million mark since before the recession in 2007.


GM sold just over 2.5 million new cars and trucks in the U.S. Its December sales rose nearly 5 percent from a year earlier.


Automakers are headed for full-year 2011 sales of about 12.8 million vehicles, 10 percent higher than 2010. U.S. auto sales have been a relative bright spot, with many cash-strapped consumers forced to purchase cars and trucks to replace vehicles that have been on the road for a decade or longer.


U.S. new-vehicle sales are an early indicator each month of consumer spending, and the United States is the world's second-largest auto market behind China.


GM, Ford and Volkswagen AG, which reported a 36 percent gain in December, all said growth would increase at a lower rate in 2012.


GM and VW expect 2012 U.S. sales in the range of 13.5 million to 14 million vehicles, which implies growth of between 5 and 9 percent. Ford sees a range of 13.2 million to 14.2 million, excluding medium and heavy-duty trucks.


"The momentum coming out of the fourth quarter gives us confidence that the low end of that forecast is less likely," Ford economist Ellen Hughes-Cromwick said on a conference call.


Industry research firm TrueCar.com expects 2012 U.S. auto sales to reach 14 million vehicles.


That is still much lower than the nearly 17 million in U.S. annual auto sales averaged in a 10-year period through 2007. In 2008, recession began to take hold and a year later GM and Chrysler filed for bankruptcy.


"Over the course of the fourth quarter of 2011, clear signs emerged that U.S. consumers are more confident and that other underpinnings of our economy are either stable or slowly improving," GM U.S. sales chief Don Johnson said in a statement.


"It's now clear that auto sales should continue to grow in 2012, barring a shock to the system," he added.


Jonathan Browning, who heads VW's U.S. operations, said the automaker chose to give a forecast range for 2012 sales because of uncertainties including the U.S. presidential election and the debt crisis in Europe.


"It just reflects the macroeconomic volatility we see around the world," Browning said of VW's forecast. "It's wise to have some flexibility in your plan."


Industry executives have repeatedly said pent-up demand would boost U.S. growth in 2012 because the average car on the road is 11 years old. Ford estimated that about 50 million vehicles, or one of every five on the road, is now 11 to 15 years old.


Automakers appear to be more disciplined about the types of sales deals they offer consumers. Incentives fell about 3 percent in December, according to TrueCar.


The picture in other markets is mixed. Sales in Western Europe are expected to reflect that region's economic hard times, but in Brazil auto sales are seen rising 4.5 percent this year, compared with a 2.9 percent increase in 2011.


GM's increase in U.S. sales in December was due to strong demand in its Chevrolet brand, where sales rose almost 9 percent. Sales of the Cruze small car jumped 54 percent, while the Sonic subcompact increased 42 percent compared with its predecessor car, the Aveo.


Ford's U.S. sales were helped by its best retail sales month since 2005.


The gain at Chrysler, which is controlled by Fiat, was due to a refreshed lineup of cars and trucks.


"They've done a remarkable job sprucing up their vehicles," said Edmunds analyst Michelle Krebs, adding that Chrysler was coming off a low base of sales in 2010.


Krebs credited last year's Super Bowl halftime TV ad, featuring rapper Eminem, for raising the brand's image with consumers.


For the year, sales at Chrysler finished up 26 percent, and the automaker said it gained 1.3 percentage points of market share.


Nissan Motor Co Ltd's U.S. sales rose 7.7 percent in December.


The annual sales rate for December, according to a Thomson Reuters poll of 30 analysts, is expected to rise about 9 percent from a year earlier to 13.6 million vehicles, topping 13 million for the fourth straight month. The December 2010 sales rate was 12.5 million vehicles. 


The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.


General Motors' December sales fall short of analyst estimates. A breakdown of the results, with Don Johnson, General Motors vice president of U.S. sales operations.

Friday, January 13, 2012

Lies, damned lies and fuel economy numbers

Lies, damned lies and fuel economy numbers
DetroitBureau


Heather Peters with her 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid.


By Paul A. Eisenstein , TheDetroitBureau.com


Heather Peters was mad as hell and wasn’t going to take it anymore.  So she decided to take Honda to court, alleging that the Japanese maker sold her a car it knew wasn’t likely to get anywhere near the mileage she had been promised.


In a case commanding national attention, former corporate attorney Peters is now waiting for a decision from a small claims court in suburban Los Angeles that could award her as much as $10,000 – though she claims Honda actually defrauded her to the tune of $122,112 by convincing her to buy a 2006 Civic Hybrid.


“The sales force said 50 miles per gallon, but they didn’t say if you run your air conditioning and you remain in stop-and-go traffic, you’re going to get 29 to 30 miles per gallon,” said the 46-year-old Peters prior to the trial. “If they did, I would have gotten the regular Civic.”


Peters isn’t alone. A number of manufacturers have been hit with criticism and, in some cases, with class action lawsuits, contending that the numbers they promote in window stickers and in advertisements are far more optimistic than buyers should expect.


And the situation only seems to be getting worse as fuel economy has become one of the single biggest factors Americans consider when shopping for a new car.  When it comes to compact and subcompact models, 40 has become the new norm, the minimum number needed in terms of highway mileage to ensure shoppers consider a particular product.


Hyundai recently announced plans to add a fourth model to its line-up rated at 40 mpg or higher.  But, in the process, it is taking fire from the Washington-based Consumer Watchdog which claims the figure quoted for the compact Hyundai Elantra is “deceptive.” The organization is asking the maker to stop using it in ads – while also demanding the Environmental Protection Agency re-test the vehicle’s fuel economy.


In a letter to Hyundai, the group said that, “With this mileage issue in the public arena, Consumer Watchdog believes you should acknowledge the real-world gap to potential buyers, or risk losing their trust.”


For its part, a statement by the Korean maker says that, Hyundai stands behind the EPA fuel economy ratings of the Elantra and we have no intention of removing our fuel economy numbers from our advertising. Simply put, the charges being made by Consumer Watchdog don’t hold up.”


The maker actually acknowledges that the testing done by a variety different magazines and consumer groups has resulted in lower fuel economy than the EPA has gotten when testing the same vehicles – but Hyundai stresses that is true across the board, not just limited to its own products.


“Enthusiast magazine fuel economy reporting (Car & Driver, Motor Trend, etc.) and even USA Today, testing typically results in lower-than-EPA results for almost all vehicles, as was found with Elantra,” said the Hyundai statement.


Part of the problem, said an industry source asking not to be identified by name, “is that manufacturers typically tune their cars to maximize their performance in the EPA test cycle.  In some cases they might actually do better in real world conditions, but in many cases they’ll get lower mileage in consumers’ hands.”


The EPA has been well aware of such discrepancies and has periodically tweaked its testing procedures to try to generate numbers that are more in-line with real-world results.  The most recent changes, made in 2008, were aimed primarily at correcting what were admittedly overstated numbers for most hybrids – such as Heather Peters’ Civic.


In some instances, the EPA has had to tweak its formula to be more generous.  Ford's Derrick Kuzak has noted that the automaker is reluctant to start offering costly start-stop technology on its vehicles because the current EPA methodology doesn’t reflect its benefits.  Start-stop systems briefly shut off a vehicle’s engine rather than idling, say, at a stoplight.  The engine automatically re-starts when the driver’s foot lifts off the brake pedal.  The EPA is considering ways to reflect the use of start-stop when determining the final rating of a vehicle.


But, more often than not, fuel economy numbers have tended to be overstated, something manufacturers are well aware of.  But, at the hearing on Peters’ complaint in a small claims courtroom in Torrance, California a Honda representative insisted, “We have no choice” but to use the EPA figures.  “We have to put these numbers on the label,” argued technical specialist Neil Schmidt.


Not so, countered an EPA spokesman, who said that federal mileage testing provides only the maximum number a maker may quote.  If a vehicle is more likely to deliver 35 in real-world conditions an automaker has the right to go with that figure, though sticking with an EPA-sanctioned 40 MPG is more likely to catch a consumer’s eye.


But the push for a high EPA rating can occasionally backfire.  When J.D. Power and Associates downgraded Ford in its Initial Quality Survey last year, one of the reasons was a balky transmission in the new Ford Focus that had been specifically tweaked to maximize mileage.  The maker has since revised the software used to balance fuel economy and ride comfort but it remains to be seen if that will drop Focus below the sought-after 40 mpg figure.


That number is, it should be pointed out, based on the highway portion of the EPA testing process.  The government actually provides three numbers: City, Highway and Combined, the latter being “the one we think is most likely to reflect what a consumer will really get in real world conditions,” noted Nissan’s chief U.S. spokesman Dave Reuter.


Unfortunately, that’s seldom a number that you’ll see quoted in advertising.


“The convention in the industry has been to promote the highway number…to represent the best competitive position,” noted Doug Scott, Ford’s Truck Group Marketing Manager.


Nonetheless, the story isn’t entirely bad.  With automakers putting more and more emphasis on fuel economy, many of the latest products are achieving 5, 10, even 15% overall – real world — gains compared to the products they replace.


Credit new technologies like direct injection, turbocharging, six-, seven- and even eight-speed gearboxes and, yes, start-stop.


Yet, a new study by MIT economist Christopher Knittel suggests that the industry could do even better if it weren’t for the fact that today’s cars are both bigger and heavier than ever.  Take the Honda Civic.  It’s now nearly big enough to be considered a midsize but debuted as a subcompact.


According to Knittel, the average gas mileage of vehicles sold in the U.S. increased by just over 15%.  Over the same period their average curb weight rose 16% — while their horsepower soared by an average 107%.


Had the typical car maintained its weight and power the typical U.S. automobile would today be getting about 37 mpg, rather than 27, Knittel noted in a new research paper, “Automobiles on Steroids,” published in the American Economic Review.


“Most of (the recent) technological program has gone into (compensating for) weight and horsepower,” he wrote.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Honda sued over mileage in small claims court

TORRANCE, Calif. — A woman who expected her 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid to be her dream car wants Honda to pay for not delivering the high mileage it promised. But rather than joining other owners in a class-action lawsuit, she is going solo in small claims court, an unusual move that could offer a bigger payout if it doesn't backfire.


A trial is set for Tuesday afternoon in Torrance, where American Honda Motor Co. has its West Coast headquarters.


Heather Peters says her car never came close to getting the promised 50 miles per gallon, and as its battery deteriorated, it was getting only 30 mpg. She wants Honda to pay for her trouble and the extra money she spent on gas.


Peters, a former lawyer who long ago gave up her bar card, has devised a unique legal vehicle to drive Honda into court — a small claims suit that could cost the company up to $10,000 in her case and every other individual case filed in the same manner.


If other claimants follow her lead, she estimates Honda could be forced to pay $2 billion in damages. No high-priced lawyers are involved and the process is streamlined.


"I would not be surprised if she won," said Richard Cupp Jr., who teaches product liability law at Pepperdine University. "The judge will have a lot of discretion and the evidentiary standards are relaxed in small claims court."


A win for Peters could encourage others to take this simplified route, he said.


"There's an old saying among lawyers," Cupp said. "If you want real justice, go to small claims court."


But he questioned whether her move, supported by publicity on the Internet and elsewhere, would start a groundswell of such suits. He suggested that few people would want to expend the time and energy that Peters has put into her suit when the potential payoff is as little as a few thousand dollars.


Peters opted out of a series of class-action lawsuits filed on behalf of similar Honda hybrid owners when she saw a proposed settlement would give owners no more than $200 cash and a rebate of $500 or $1,000 to purchase a new Honda.


The settlement would give trial lawyers $8.5 million, Peters said.


"I was shocked," she said. "I wrote to Honda and said I would take $7,500, which was then the limit on small claims in California. It is going up to $10,000 in 2012."


She said she also offered to trade her hybrid for a comparable car with a manual transmission, the only thing she trusted at that point.


'I filed the suit'
"I wrote the letter and I said, 'If you don't respond, I will file a suit in small claims court.' I gave them my phone number," she said. "They never called, and I filed the suit."


She said she also sent emails to top executives at Honda with no response.


Aaron Jacoby, a Los Angeles attorney who heads the automotive industry group at the Arent Fox law firm, said Peters' strategy, while intriguing, is unlikely to change the course of class-action litigation.


"In the class-action, the potential claimants don't have to do anything," Jacoby said. "It's designed to be an efficient way for a court to handle multiple claims of the same type."


He also questioned her criticism of class-action lawyers for the fees they receive. Jacoby, who handles such cases, said lawyers who take on the multiple clients involved do extensive work — sometimes spanning years — and are not in it just for money.


"They're representing the underdog and they believe they are performing a public duty," he said. "Many of these people could not get lawyers to represent them individually."


American Honda's offices were closed for the holidays and no one could be reached for comment. Peters said the company has tried five times to delay the trial but each effort was rebuffed.


The upside of Peters' unusual move, she says, is that litigants are not allowed to have lawyers argue in small claims court in California. This means any award will not be diluted by attorney's fees. Honda would have to appoint a non-lawyer employee to argue its side in court.


"If I prevail and get $10,000, they have 200,000 of these cars out there. That's a potential payout of $2 billion," she said.


While she doubts that all other owners will take the same route, she suggests the penalty could be substantial for the company if a large percentage of the owners file individually.


A judge in San Diego County is due to rule in March on whether to approve Honda's latest class action settlement offer. Members of the class have until Feb. 11 to accept or decline the settlement.


Peters has launched a website, DontSettleWithHonda.org, urging others to take the small claims route.


Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

So far, battery cars coming up short

So far, battery cars coming up short
Tyrone Siu / Reuters


By Paul A. Eisenstein, TheDetroitBureau.com


If the White House hopes to meet its ambitious goal of putting 1.5 million battery cars on the road by mid-decade it better hope that 2011 wasn’t a good indication of what Americans think of electric vehicles.


Add them all up, hybrids, plug-ins and pure battery-electric vehicles, or BEVs, and they accounted for little more than 2% of the U.S. automotive market last year.  Remove conventional gas-electric models, such as the Toyota Prius and Ford Fusion Hybrid, from the equation and more advanced battery vehicles generated barely 20,000 sales.


“I’d say they failed,” proclaims Joe Phillippi, chief analyst with AutoTrends Consulting.


For his part, David Sullivan, of AutoPacific, Inc., isn’t quite ready to go that far, but he sees 2012 as the really critical year.  The limited demand for electric vehicles, so far, has largely been driven by the early adopters, contends Sullivan.  “Now we’ll see if there’s broader consumer demand.”


That’s going to be critical as the industry ramps up battery car production capacity and an assortment of new models charge into showrooms.


While there are a variety of products already on the market, most come from niche manufacturers that barely even register on the sales charts.  Last year brought the introduction of two closely watched mainstream models: the Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid and the Nissan Leaf BEV.


General Motors had declared a goal of selling 10,000 Volts but will likely end the year at around 7,000.  The good news for the maker was that momentum had been building during the final quarter but then Chevy found itself in the uncomfortable position of having to explain why several Volts caught fire weeks after being subjected to federal crash tests.


Though there have been reports that last month’s sales were down sharply, GM spokesman Rob Peterson contends, “December sales are solid – definitely not “down sharply” as reported.”


But there’s no question the timing of the news was bad, coming just as GM was getting ready to boost production to 60,000 for all of 2012, 45,000 of those earmarked for the U.S.  The results of an investigation into the problem by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration could clear Volt — or cause it significant problems if a redesign of its battery pack proves necessary.


Nissan came closer to its 2011 target, though it will likely fall a little short of the 10,000 mark when December sales are revealed later this week.  The maker can explain at least some of that away by pointing to the March 11 Japanese earthquake and tsunami that interrupted production for several months.  But Leaf sales have been slipping for several months, a worrying sign as Nissan prepares to open a new facility in Smyrna, Tennessee capable of churning out 200,000 battery cars annually.


There are a number of reasons why proponents believe American buyers aren’t plugging into battery cars.  For one thing, there’s still a relatively limited range of choices available.  But that won’t be an excuse in 2012.


The options coming to market are broad, ranging from the Fisker Karma, a plug-in sports car, to the Ford Focus Electric.  There are electric minicars, like the new Mitsubishi i, and big SUVs, including the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Mercedes-Benz ML350 that Ohio-based Amp Electric is converting to run on battery power.  There will be mainstream offerings, such as the Toyota RAV-4 Electric, and products from aggressive start-ups, such as Tesla’s new Model S sedan.


The Model S will aim to overcome one of the biggest drawbacks of battery power, offering buyers a choice of a base Model S with a range of 160-miles, or optional 230- or 300-mile battery packs, the latter adding $20,000 to the price tag.  Most other pure BEVs are limited to less than 100 miles per charge.


Even then, they aren’t cheap, battery vehicles saddled by price tags that are thousands – in some cases, tens of thousands – of dollars more than comparable gasoline vehicles.


That might make sense had fuel prices held at the near-record levels seen in early 2011, but gas has dropped sharply since then.  Meanwhile, manufacturers have been making major strides when it comes to the fuel efficiency of conventional, gas-powered vehicles.  In the compact segment where Ford will compete with the Focus Electric, for example, 40 mpg on the highway is the new norm.


Both government bureaucrats and electric vehicle manufacturers, says analyst Sullivan, “aren’t giving consumers credit for being able to do the math.  It just doesn’t make economic sense” to buy an electric vehicle – at least if your primary goal is to save money by reducing your energy bills.


There are, of course, other reasons.  There’s the desire to clean up the air and to curb oil imports, especially from the Mideast.  But whether that can be used to draw more buyers into the market remains to be seen.  Especially in this economy, value is the big motivator, rather than politics and social concerns.


So, the industry will have a big challenge ahead finding ways to lure customers into the showroom and getting them to drive off in a hybrid, plug-in or battery-electric vehicle. The past year certainly didn’t live up to expectations.  So, the coming year will be the big test.


 

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

$100,000 electric cars recalled over fire risk

 WASHINGTON — Even expensive electric cars get recalled sometimes.


Fisker Automotive is recalling its 2012 Karma because of a potential coolant leak.


The plug-in hybrid cars cost about $100,000. Fisker has sold about 50 of them and says 1,200 more are in production or waiting to be sold.


Improperly installed hose clamps in the car's battery pack could cause coolant to leak, which could start a fire. Fisker says no incidents have been reported by customers or retailers.


The company says it will replace the battery pack.


Fisker was founded in 2007 and is privately held. It's based in Irvine, Calif.


The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is also investigating a fire in the battery of a Chevrolet Volt that may have been caused by a coolant leak.


Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Monday, January 9, 2012

A sad end to Saab’s story

A sad end to Saab’s story
Sean Gallup / Getty Images fo;e


The logo of Swedish automaker Saab.


By Paul A. Eisenstein


With the filing of bankruptcy papers this week it’s all over for Saab but the funeral. Or is it? 


Few automakers have existed so long and so close to the precipice -- or shown the uncanny ability to come back from the seeming dead.  But this week’s developments would suggest that the Swedish automaker will soon wind up on the automotive rust heap.


The news leaves a lot of folks wondering what will happen next, among them Saab car owners, the maker’s creditors and its employees. There’s relatively little in the kitty left to cover the carmaker’s debts, and a Saab spokesperson today told us warranty service has been “temporarily suspended.”


Even after filing for bankruptcy on Monday, Dutch businessman Victor Muller -- who purchased Saab from General Motors in early 2010 and who has been serving as its chairman -- remained surprisingly optimistic, telling the Dow Jones newswires:


“With a bankruptcy, it is now possible to start with a clean slate.”


Exactly what that means remains to be seen, as the bankrupt firm’s parent, Muller’s Swedish Automobile, or SWAN, said it would write off its investment in the automaker. 


There are signs others may see gold amidst the rust, however. The Swedish Ministry of Enterprise says it has received a “number of calls” from potential buyers of Saab’s remaining assets. Among those interested is Zhejiang Youngman Lotus, the ambitious Chinese automaker that had hoped to strike a deal with Saab to head off the Swedish company’s bankruptcy.


It ran into a brick wall in the form of General Motors, which made clear it didn’t want to create a new competitor for its own Chinese operations -- GM being the largest automaker in the booming Asian market. Though it had sold off Saab in 2010, the U.S. company remained one of its biggest suppliers, providing engines and other parts for Saab’s 9-3 and 9-5 models and assembling the new 9-4X crossover vehicle at a GM plant in Mexico.


But Youngman could purchase Saab’s other assets -- if it can figure out precisely what those are. There are the designs for the current Saab models, though it’s unclear what value they would have without GM’s cooperation. There’s also the next-generation Saab 9-3, which was going to migrate to an engine provided by BMW. 


There’s also the Saab name itself -- although industry analysts see it as severely tarnished in light of the maker’s long-running death spiral. And a purchaser might still have to get approval to use the brand name from Swedish defense company Saab AB, which sold the automaker to GM a decade ago.


Saab started out as an aircraft manufacturer, originally known as Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget. A group of the company’s engineers, looking for ways to keep busy as defense spending collapsed, put together the company’s first automobile shortly after World War II.


Saab never developed a solid financial foundation. GM bought a 50 percent stake in 1989, acquiring the rest of the company 11 years later. GM decided it close or sell off Saab -- along with three other North American brands -- after emerging from bankruptcy in 2009.


Saab was set to close when Muller stepped in later that year. The deal was completed early in 2010 and gave Muller, among other things, Saab’s headquarters and assembly plant in Trollhattan, Sweden.


The Swedish carmaker earlier this year had raised some preliminary cash by selling its factory and other properties. What use they will be to anyone remains unclear. While the Saab assembly plant was one of GM’s most modern it is located far from the center of European automotive manufacturing and in a country with some of the Continent’s highest labor costs.


Part of the challenge for anyone interested in purchasing Saab assets is that it would also have to deal with both the Swedish government and the European Investment Bank, the latter having provided a 400 million euro loan to back the sale of Saab last year to what was then known as Spyker Cars.


The Swedish courts have already appointed two trustees to try to rescue whatever is possible from the ruins of Saab. Muller hinted he would like to see workers -- who have gone unpaid for months -- get something in time for the holidays, though that seems unlikely.


Despite its problems, Saab has maintained a small core of loyalists; U.S. sales totaled almost 4,000 units this year. The question is what will happen to those and previous buyers. Vehicles sold when GM owned the company should qualify for warranty service at GM dealers, according to several industry sources, but there could be hiccups in the short-term, and as for vehicles -- like the new 9-4X -- purchased after the sale, that could be another matter entirely. 


But for the moment, the news is bad for all Saab owners. Saab USA spokesperson Michele Tinson noted that, “all warranty coverage is now being suspended until we have further direction from the [bankruptcy] trustees.”


Even those older GM-built models are facing delays. Should a customer have an immediate problem, Tinson said, it will be “up to the discretion of the dealer” to decide whether to provide covered repairs or charge the owner.


 

Sunday, January 8, 2012

GM recalls about 20,000 Cadillac SRX globally

General Motors Co said it is recalling almost 20,000 Cadillac SRX crossover vehicles, mostly in China and the United States, due to potential transmission defects.


GM's Chinese joint venture, Shanghai GM, is recalling 9,862 of the compact luxury SUVs in that country, while GM is recalling 8,789 in the United States. A small number in 20 other countries are also affected, a GM spokesman said.


Shanghai GM is a joint venture between GM and SAIC Motor Corp.


The vehicles affected in the recall are from the 2010 and 2011 model years, and were built at GM's Ramos Arizpe plant in Mexico.


GM, in a letter to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said it received a customer letter in June alleging unintended vehicle motion in a 2011 SRX as the customer tried to shift between park and drive and then back to park. The customer reported that he stopped the vehicle with the service brake and then set the parking brake.


GM said in the letter to NHTSA that it found in some cases the transmission shift cable was not properly routed in the vehicle's engine compartment. A deeper investigation by the automaker found potential claims dating back to the fall of 2010.


A GM spokesman said there have been no reports of accidents or injuries in any countries affected by the recall.


In a separate announcement, GM said on Wednesday it is recalling 3,150 Chevrolet Captiva crossovers sold to rental car agencies in the United States for a power steering overheating issue that could lead to an engine compartment fire. The model years affected are 2011 and 2012.


The Captivas being recalled also were built at the Ramos Arizpe plant.


If the vehicle is inadvertently driven with the transmission in manual mode and left in first gear for a prolonger period of time, its power steering fluid may overheat and cause a leak that could result in a fire, GM said. There have been no reports of fire.


Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Man wins Lamborghini, crashes it, will sell it

SALT LAKE CITY — A truck driver who won a $380,000 Lamborghini in a convenience store contest crashed the sports car six hours after he got it, and he now plans to sell the 640-horsepower convertible because he can't afford the insurance or taxes.


"I already had offers on it. I'm going to sell it," David Dopp said Wednesday. "I have bills more important than a Lamborghini. I've got a family to support."


Dopp, a 34-year-old truck driver for Frito-Lay, spun out of control just a few hours after taking the keys to the Murcielago Roadster that he won in a "Joe Schmo to Lambo" contest sponsored by Maverik convenience stores.


The lime green convertible was being held by his insurance company at a Utah towing yard. It will be sent to an authorized Las Vegas dealer for repairs next week.


Dopp told The Associated Press the damage "isn't super bad" — a punctured oil pan and wheel and a few dents and scratches on the front and rear ends. The father of six said he couldn't afford to pay taxes on the car or the insurance, which runs $3,500 every six months.


"That's why rich people own them," he said. "The poor people like me don't."


Dopp was taking family members and friends on joy rides the first evening. He said he took a curve at about 45 mph and "hit some black ice and spun out." The car jumped a curb and went through a fence before coming to a rest about 75 feet off the road. Neither Dopp nor his passenger was injured.


"My heart pretty much fell out," Annette Dopp told KSL-TV of Salt Lake City. "They said they were OK. Then (came), you know, that feeling when your heart drops and you're like, 'Oh, my gosh. What do we do now?'"


The Lamborghini was the envy of Santaquin, a town of 9,000 about 55 miles south of Salt Lake City. Police say the Lamborghini's high-performance summer tires weren't suited for icy conditions and the car is simply too powerful — and exceptionally light with carbon fiber body parts. Dopp wasn't ticketed.


Dopp was videotaped jumping up and down and hollering in speechless disbelief when contest officials announced during a Nov. 12 college football game that he won the car. He had to take out insurance before he could claim the car — "that was a good thing," he says — and took the keys to the roadster Saturday.


Dopp said he never imagined he could keep the car for long because it costs too much to own.


He also won $5,000 worth of driving lessons at Miller Motorsports Park in Tooele County.


Dopp said he'll be more careful the next time he gets behind the wheel.


The giveaway contest was for customers who use a rewards card at Maverik's 220 stores. It was co-sponsored by nonprofit organization "teamgive," which raises awareness about rare neurological diseases.


Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.